Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More aboard! Amtrak weighs long route improvements
Associated Press ^ | April 14, 2010 | MATT LEINGANG

Posted on 04/14/2010 7:43:34 AM PDT by Willie Green

COLUMBUS, Ohio — In many states, travelers who take Amtrak's long-distance trains for vacations or out-of-state business trips board in the middle of the night and return home from such cities as Chicago or New York City at times that are just as inconvenient.

But some improvements are on the way. Amtrak, the country's only major passenger train system, is re-examining timetables and finding other ways to improve its 15 national routes to bring in more riders and revenue. Among those under review are two routes that dip into Ohio and are practically hidden at night, their trains passing through when most people are sleeping.

Businessman Dave Shreiner, 63, typically boards around 1:30 a.m. at a tiny Amtrak stop in Alliance, Ohio. He travels exclusively by rail half of the year, visiting clients around the U.S.

"It makes planning a trip a challenge," Shreiner said.

The push for upgrades comes as Amtrak is on pace for record ridership this year, carrying a best-ever 13.6 million passengers in the first half of fiscal year 2010. That's a 4.3-percent increase over the same period last year, and 100,000 more than 13.5 million posted in the first half of 2008, Amtrak's previous highest ridership of 28.7 million passengers.

Amtrak cites an improving economy and high fuel prices as factors in ridership growth.

President Barack Obama is also giving $8 billion in stimulus money to 13 high-speed rail projects and 31 states, though Amtrak's role in those projects is murky, since states will control the funds. Some of the projects are years away from completion.

In the meantime, Amtrak is putting all of its long-distance routes under review through 2012, including five this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: railroads; stimulus; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2010 7:43:34 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

A big improvement would be to sell off lines to local interests and run them as lines for profit. Kick the gov’t guidance out and let the market decide which lines will work and which won’t.


2 posted on 04/14/2010 7:49:29 AM PDT by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ
A big improvement would be to sell off lines to local interests and run them as lines for profit.

IMHO, the Government should own and maintain the actual right-of-way and rails. Private interests would then compete against each other for the opportunity to operate their rolling stock on those lines.

It is the same model upon which our roads, highways and airlines are built.
The railroads should be no different.

We don't permit airlines to "own" the air corridors,
and we don't permit trucking companies to "own" our highways.
It is an abomination to grant freight railroads monopoly control of our rail system.

3 posted on 04/14/2010 8:03:26 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Wouldn't do anything to improve passenger rail service.

The freight railroads are perfectly happy with roadbeds and rights of way which are suitable for 40-60 mph operation.

To get the trackage needed for passenger speeds (not even bullet train speeds, just the timetables that were maintained in the 40's) you'd need a massive investment by the government "owners" of the track (read: taxpayers), or by the passenger railroad itself, which could never afford it.

The only way we'll ever get better train service in America is if the airlines and the TSA finally manage to make air travel so unutterably hellish that Americans demand better trains. Those two entities are certainly on the right track (no pun intended) to achieving that result.

4 posted on 04/14/2010 8:12:21 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi Tio es infermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Since states will control the funds.Get back it ain’t going to happen now.


5 posted on 04/14/2010 8:25:33 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
The only way we'll ever get better train service in America is if the airlines and the TSA finally manage to make air travel so unutterably hellish that Americans demand better trains.

The rising cost of jet fuel is making short-hop air travel less economically attractive than passenger rail. Already the airlines are infuriating the customers with surcharges for "fat" passengers and carry-on luggage.

Since there is no available substitute for petroleum based jet fuel, this trend will only get worse in the future, and passenger rail will prevail on short, regional trips of 150~600 miles.

6 posted on 04/14/2010 8:26:47 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
The only way we'll ever get better train service in America is if the airlines and the TSA finally manage to make air travel so unutterably hellish that Americans demand better trains. Those two entities are certainly on the right track (no pun intended) to achieving that result.

Then we'll get TSA at the train stations. To harass people there too.

7 posted on 04/14/2010 8:28:27 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (we now live in a post-Obamapacolyptic world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

A one way trip from Minneapolis to Boston costs approx. 380$... Unless I want a small sleeping cabin about the size of my linen closet. That’s an additional 650$ for only one short leg of the trip. The trip, of course, is a mere *28* hours long with hours-long stopovers in Chicago and New York. How far would 1000$ get me on an airplane? A hell of a lot farther than Boston, that’s for sure.

Why on Earth would anyone use Amtrak for anything other than a creative way to blow time and money?

APf


8 posted on 04/14/2010 8:36:01 AM PDT by APFel (Regnum Nostrum Crescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ

Warren Buffet is working on that.


9 posted on 04/14/2010 8:36:21 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Right. Though I am not sure about the gov’t owning all rails.

By line, I didn’t mean the physical lines themselves. Just the routes, trains, etc.


10 posted on 04/14/2010 8:42:01 AM PDT by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

“Businessman Dave Shreiner, 63, typically boards around 1:30 a.m. at a tiny Amtrak stop in Alliance, Ohio. He travels exclusively by rail half of the year, visiting clients around the U.S.”

...wow...calling on accounts using the train...that’s really old school...like guys used to do back in the 40s and 50s before the interstate hiway system...and btw, in some cities there are still hotels next to the old train stations...back in the day, they did a lot of business with commercial travelers.


11 posted on 04/14/2010 8:54:17 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Just out of curiosity, I looked at an AMTRAK vacation. I could buy airfare and hotel for a week in Europe or a 5 day cruise for what the AMTRAK fare alone would cost to go most anywhere. The prospect of having to leave or return at 3 am made the deal even less attractive. It’s too bad as when I was a kid my family took several train vacations when there was still top notch rail service and the experience was memorable.


12 posted on 04/14/2010 8:55:29 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Businessman Dave Shreiner, 63, typically boards around 1:30 a.m. at a tiny Amtrak stop in Alliance, Ohio. He travels exclusively by rail half of the year, visiting clients around the U.S.

???

He travels all across the US, for six months of the year -- and he "typically" boards at 1:30 AM in Alliance, Ohio? That makes no sense.

13 posted on 04/14/2010 9:01:09 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
. . . the Government should own and maintain the actual right-of-way and rails. Private interests would then compete against each other for the opportunity to operate their rolling stock on those lines.

What could possibly go wrong?

14 posted on 04/14/2010 9:08:36 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
IMHO, the Government should own and maintain the actual right-of-way and rails. Private interests would then compete against each other for the opportunity to operate their rolling stock on those lines.

You and I think alike, my friend. Providing infrastructure is a legitimate activity of a government. Providing services is not.

15 posted on 04/14/2010 9:13:25 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Unfortunately rail service is still inconvenient, slow, and costs as much as a plane ticket.

The grey dog isn’t any better but you get the joy of nasty, scary passengers and stations.


16 posted on 04/14/2010 9:51:19 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (There's one in every crowd...would that someone please raise his hand to save us all some time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Unfortunately rail service is still inconvenient, slow, and costs as much as a plane ticket.

That's precisely why we need to invest the funds to upgrade and improve performance to modern, 21st Century standars.

17 posted on 04/14/2010 10:09:04 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; All

and yet you call your self a conservative..


18 posted on 04/14/2010 4:28:59 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Jesus Saves... Allah Kills...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Paris and Madrid and New York and Chicago are almost exactly the same distance apart (about 780 miles). A nice little research project would be to compare train trips for these two locations comparing
- cost
- time
- frequency
- reliability (on time arrivals)

Then factor in a fudge factor for how nice the trip would be - how good is the food, how clean are the trains, how safe you would feel making the trip etc. etc.

My guess is that the results would be quite dramatic i.e. dramatically different.


19 posted on 04/14/2010 4:38:55 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Amtrak's quickest/cheapest direct route NYC to Chicago is the Lake Shoe Ltd at $86 for a one-way 19 hr trip. (reserved coach seat) It looks like this train operates once a day.
There are two other options involving transfers to a second train, one in Pittsburgh and one in DC. Those trips take about 23 hrs, including the layover to change trains. Fares for the other routes are also slightly higher ($100~120 or + $25~40 if upgrading to business class)

Euro Railways Paris to Madrid is faster (about 13½ hrs) but also more expensive (cheapest fare I spotted was $130 for a Tourist Passholder fare, but can quickly escalate to $300, $500 or even $850 for the more plush amenities. Click on the link if you want more information. I'm unfamiliar with scheduling European rail travel and am uncertain about how to interpret this info.

But you're right, it is a bit of a surprise!

20 posted on 04/14/2010 8:11:31 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson