Posted on 04/14/2010 7:41:14 AM PDT by Woebama
Edited on 04/14/2010 3:31:35 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Pit maverick Republican Congressman Ron Paul against President Obama in a hypothetical 2012 election match-up, and the race is – virtually dead even.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of likely voters finds Obama with 42% support and Paul with 41% of the vote. Eleven percent (11%) prefer some other candidate, and six percent (6%) are undecided.
OH?
Different account?
So you’re a retread?
What was your previous handle?
Your posts 12 and 14 that I linked to prove this statement here false.
And every subsequent post of yours proves this statement false.
You are a ru paul supporter.
“and watched videos of Paul and he made a lot of sense.”
Yet you’re not a ru paul supporter.
Is there anything you say that isn’t a lie?
“Has Ron Paul done anything to insult or harm our troops?”
Other than provide aid and comfort to the enemy by attempting to harm our ability to kill the enemy, making every effort to badmouth the war effort, and generally trying to stick his head in the sand over the fact that the enemy is better off dying over there rather than coming here?
LOL, you’re the troll.
” I really think the anti-paul people are the stupidest and nastiest group at Free Republic.”
Yet you’re not a ru paul supporter.
And no, the nastiest and dumbest are the ru paul supporters.
You’re already a Ru Paul supporter, how about you go somewhere it is actually a merit?
Like.. Clown Posse?
*oops.. they’re gone!*
” I really don’t know that much about Paul.”
Yet when someone posts something negative about him, you repeat the paulbot line of “No facts!”
You’re the wost liar in history, you know that?
A Lyndon Larouche analogy would be far more apt.
Yeah.. I know.
But I was thinking on Perot and his “I’m running, no I’m not, oh... say hello to a Presidnet Clinton” fiasco.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2490843/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2490573/posts
Ron Paul proves he’s an idiot by saying that Obama is not a socialist.
Ron paul also stacks the straw polls:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2490077/posts
LaRouche went to Jail .... Hmmmmmm
You just posted 8 posts in a row! You claim a picture exists but (of course) don’t post it; I think this is time #3 in this thread that you’ve done that. You keep repeating the same stuff you said earlier and trying to call names but even messing up at that (at least if you want to effect me). All I want is facts. Post the pic. Do something (anything) other than mouth off.
Ping 255, I take it from up thread that this was the pic mentioned?
Why is actually talking to someone rather than calling them names stupid?
Here’s a link to the whole interview you posted there. You’ll note it is “edited” so is not verbatim, unfortunately if your purpose is to find a pole to hoist Paul up on.
And I think if you google it you’ll see that a lot of people question some of Lincoln’s choices (especially with the hindsight of how much our government has grown once state’s rights were destroyed).
http://rightwingnews.com/2010/03/an-interview-with-ron-paul/
Regarding his “corporatist” line, you know that corporatism is fascist economics. Do you really think Paul is a fool to think Obama is a corporatist? I think it’s exactly what Obama is. A one world fascist.
So what is that? Paul with someone embarrassing? Did he know?
Actually, fascist economics are socialist, not corporatist. This is a common misunderstanding by not really knowing what was behind Mussolini’s statement on the subject. (the infamous ‘marriage of state and corporate’). The difference between fascist implementation of socialism and your typical Euro-style socialism is that one is bottom up while the other is bottom down. What Obama is doing is not ‘corporatist’ in that it is corporations running the government- at that, he is doing the opposite, he is taking the top down socialist approach, undermining corporations to the point of collapse at which point he steps in and takes over said corporations, making them wards of the State. This is the Franco model. Most people only think of socialism in its bottom-up form, as a worker’s movement, but it works as a top-down form as well, taking over corporations and industry by replacing the ownership with the State.
“Corporatist” economic models is more of what one would see in Japan where corporations have representatives in the seat of government and influence policy. Definitely not what you are seeing here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.