Yes, but most of us can read a temperture gauge for ourselves, and know that there hasn’t been a measurable increase in global temps since at least 1998.
We also know the margin of error for the global warming kooks from the days of the British Empire 150 years ago had a margin of error well beyond the suggested increase since that time.
Finally, enviromental issues don’t decide national election cycles. MSM slantings sometimes do, as we just saw.
Why go there, when its disputable from either side, when the economic issues that affect every one of us are not?
Finally, enviromental issues don’t decide national election cycles. They should. Those who pledge to spend TRILLIONS on a BALD FACED LIE of MARXIST GLOBAL RESTRIBUTION OF WEALTH do not deserve to hold ANY public office.
And yes that damn well goes for Newt Gingrich too.
If we'd made Socialized Medicine (and opposition to it) a campaign item in 2008, Obama would have had a tougher campaign. Nope. Had to sit on the Reagan quotes until the week before the bill went through the House.
Too little. Too late. Never surrender the debate. MAKE it a campaign issue. Everything else is just campaign slogans and graphic arts.
