Posted on 04/14/2010 6:59:03 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
After candidates complain to organizers, Orly Taitz's speaking engagement is withdrawn. Taitz has been a leading voice in the discredited 'birther' movement.
(snip)
One candidate threatened to withdraw from the event before Tuesday's decision to uninvite Taitz. John Dennis, who is running for the Republican nomination to oppose House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco, said he would not appear on the same stage as Taitz.
"The presence of a discredited publicity seeker on the same platform with patriotic Americans distorts the focus of our movement, distracts from our common message and gives ammunition to those who continue to question our legitimacy," Dennis said in a statement.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
According to most of congress he was vetted properly. We know differently but this is why main stream media viewers think birthers are nutjobs. They can’t believe someone was not vetted. Not in America.
Obama himself said he could not pass a confirmation hearing for scotus.I do not believe Obama could even get a passport after 9/11. I have read reports where researchers requested any former passports of Obama’s and there were none in the United States. Whether true or not I don’t know. But it makes sense Obama used his Indonesia passport until he got into the senate where he received the senate passport whatever it is called.
My answer is probably not as a AIDE either. Except I think there are communist powers behind who would find a way.
That's definitely not true. The FOIA's on Obama's passport info were denied by the DOS on the basis of the FOIA privacy rules -- info on living persons is not released without their specific written authorization.
So Obama refuses to show that too, huh? Wow! I would show every document I owned if I wanted to be president.
The story I read was they did not request the actual document. They requested if there was one available. It came back none in Obama’s name.
Nice try though.
Really? Who made such a request?
If you've got a couple of hours to spare, you can go rooting through Christopher Strunk's electic mix of lawsuits against virtually everyone as filed on scribd. He filed the DOS response letter to his Obama passport FOIA request as an attachment to one of his motions -- there was nothing in it to suggest the records didn't exist. They did however, quote the applicable privacy clauses in the FOIA rules, which prohibit release of a living person's records without express written permission of the person.
But, of course, you read "a story" somewhere -- so, if it's on the internet, it must be true...for sure. ;)
Yeah, that's it. No one but you chad knows what is going on. You are a Lord of all knowing ObamaBot.
Of course we have you to come in and post nonsense with no links to discredit anything anti Obama.
It would not be hard to find Chad. Do a search for it. Some people take information as a whole and have common sense what is going on. Others just follow their leader.
This makes absolutley no sense at all. Why would they include the fact Obama had no former passport with a FOIA for the one he has now?
Your thought process is screwed up or you are intentionally obfuscating as usual. No I don't have a couple of hours to research your nonsense way of thinking.
You appear to have a reading comprehension problem — or you just want to be boorish.
No thanks. Bye.
Poor widdle chad, got caught again in his spin to protect obama.
You were a liar and a bore a year ago and still are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.