Posted on 04/13/2010 11:43:41 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
You posts are not address to anyone.
Who are you talking to?
Because he'd lost to Obammy once already?
LOLOLOLOL........You’re funny!
Keyes occasionaly finds a Truffle.....
Sarah is the President in Waiting!
Rhu Paulites are given away by their obsession.
It was considered at one time (circa 1793) that the children born overseas of U.S. citizens would be ‘Natural Born Citizens’. It was repealed in 1795.
Children born overseas of U.S. citizens are born ‘jus sanguinas’, or citizen by blood, and are citizens by statute. Children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents or just one U.S. citizen parent are ‘jus solis’, or citizen of the soil. There are legal statutes determining those types of citizenship.
There is no statute for “Natural Born Citizen” because it is natural law - that a child born in a country to citizen parents is a citizen is unquestionable. No statute needed. Our founders knew what the definition of a natural born citizen entailed.
One should keep in mind that there is no right to be President. “Natural Born Citizenship” is a circumstance of birth that only applies to the elegibility requirement to be President - nothing else. It is a form of national security to prevent a President with split allegiences.
Because after playing the "race card" himself, he turned tail and joined up with (or formed, take your pick) a new party. As such, his opinions on matters RNC are as valid as the Democrats', which is to say, not at all.
And I say this as a 1996 and 2000 Keyes supporter. By then end of the 2000 primary season, I had finally realized that Keyes is all about self-aggrandizement, manufactured moral outrage, and a complete and utter lack of doing anything actually required to be put in a position of governance.
onyx, rabscuttle385 is not the only person here questioning the temperament of Palin's followers, or the judgment and qualifications of Palin herself.
The skeptics and critics comprise a very diverse group - many of whom vehemently disagree with one another on other topics.
I would agree that she is a populist politician with conservative instincts and without a consistent ideology. However, I also see her support for Alaska's tax on oil companies, bridge to nowhere, her resignation, support for McCain and Steele and simultaneous support for Tea Parties as all calculated career moves.
I don’t know why they won’t go after Obama’s birth as a subject.
I suspect they really, really want to put a stake through the heart of progressivism/liberalism/socialism in this country first, then drum Obama out because he isn’t a U.S. citizen.
In the meantime we’ve got front row seats and watch our nation enduring Hell.
“...[McCain] if he was born on a US installation or in some circumstances, born to US parrents serving the US in a foreign location, he was born on US soil and is a “natural born” American.”
John Sydney McCain was born in a public hospital in the city of Colon, Republic of Panama.
I’ve talked to two immigration lawyers who tell me that there are legal statutes dealing with the citizenship of children born in Panama to U.S. citizens.
McCain is a citizen-by-statute (jus sanguinas) because his parents were citizens. He is not a ‘natural born citizen’.
In all the years we have known one another, this is likely the first time I don't think you deserve a reply from me. My statement stands. The punk I cited is a disruptor. He doesn't 'question,' he attacks, just like a rabid dog. I'm surprised that you don't see that. Sad.
Honest differences are one thing, but a constant drumbeat of deceit, half truths and the hiding of his reasons for hating her are what we have against him. Most of us have questions about Sarah, as we do of all candidates, she's not perfect (neither was Reagan, but I sure liked him). For most of us, she seems to fit the description of the best conservative to come against the Obama agenda, and if she runs, the best candidate.
You have that backwards. To give you an example, I would say that I take Sarah Palin at her word when she says McCain is the best person for the Senate in Arizona. But many of her supporters argue that I am wrong, and that Sarah is only saying that because she feels she has to be loyal to McCain.
Which, if you believe that, means they say Sarah Palin would lie about McCain out of loyalty.
So, who is the better Sarah Palin supporter? The guy who believes what she says, or the one who argues she must be lying because they don't LIKE what she is saying?
Thanks.
:-)
Well, just dayum and I am ulti-tasking too.
Tons of FR mail and I am way behind on pings and I have a new ‘student’ today from your state. So there.
Happy teaching. Hope they aren't as dense as I was.
I find you and your little pack of political GOP groupies disgusting...
The woman supported and aided and abetted a known open borders, pro amnesty politician.
Some of us will not tolerate that behavior and would rather juggle chain saws than continue to get screwed by people that talk out of both sides of their mouth. Been there done that. Not again.
You and your political groupie clan will just have to deal with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.