Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AZ-Sen. 2010: J.D. Hayworth Calls on John McCain to Oppose Possible Hillary Appt. to Supreme Court
J.D. Hayworth 2010 ^ | 2010-04-13

Posted on 04/13/2010 5:48:21 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“That internet ad by McCain was devastating, because the narrative shows JD as an unhinged kook.”

and Sarah supporting McCain doesn’t help either. When does country come before “decorum” and loyalty to a progressive? We are about to be “decorumed” into a socialist oligarchy cesspool.


21 posted on 04/13/2010 6:46:25 PM PDT by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Conservative9

LOL! Did McCain really call someone ELSE an unhinged kook? We have enough video of the unhinged McCain to last an entire election season. The bottom line is people are much, much smarter now and there’s so much on the line.


22 posted on 04/13/2010 6:48:27 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hildy; Extremely Extreme Extremist
You don’t even live here in AZ, so what the hell are you talking about. He IS speaking our language, from immigration to health care.

Way to rebut EEE's statement. Oh wait....you didn't.

BTW EEE, McCain has a 7% lead over Hayworth according to Rasmussen. After the Palin endorsement it was 53-31 or thereabouts but has since closed somewhat.

I agree that at some point EEE is going to have to start providing some substance or he'll end up polling in the high 30s percentage-wise in the primary.
23 posted on 04/13/2010 6:51:15 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (There is no truth to the rumor that Ted Kennedy was buried at sea.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

J.D.’s right, but he must be smoking some of them left handed cigarettes to think McKennedy is going to do anything but swoon over hitlery.

Damn I hope AZ shows juan the door!!


24 posted on 04/13/2010 7:43:04 PM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
McCain <3 Libs
25 posted on 04/13/2010 8:08:26 PM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (purple durple lips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The Intrernet is capital I. It has the same rights as you and I. Remember.


26 posted on 04/13/2010 8:11:20 PM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (purple durple lips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; Congressman Billybob
I. 6. No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

Hillary was elected for the term of Jan 2007 - Jan 2013. Now I believe that the salary of Secretary of State was reduced so she could get the job, and that a position on SCOTUS would have to be similarly reduced.

Of course that would leave us with the difficult situation of having one associate justice at a lower pay grade than the others.

Much was made about the legislative calendar and the confirmation? calendar during the "nuclear" option discussion. Appointments can never be anything other than "Shall Person X be confirmed to the office of Y?"

But additional amendments can always be offered on bills, with arguments for and against. That is the purpose of the filibuster.

As I recall, Hatch's name was floated after the Bork rejection because as a Senator he would likely receive courtesy that another court nominee would not.

What I'm asking is, when legislation to reduce the pay of a federal judgeship is considered, is that voted on before the confirmation? I would think it would have to be. That vote could be filibustered; thus Senatorial courtesy (if it still exists) could be preserved but Hillary would still be denied the seat.

Whether that's a good strategy (others are more liberal than Hillary) is another story.

27 posted on 04/13/2010 8:18:18 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

honestly, who cares what any of you think. It’s up to us here in AZ.


28 posted on 04/13/2010 8:22:08 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

I disagree. The point is valid. McCain would vote for Hillary if nominated. Whether she is nominated or not, the fact that McCain would vote for her speaks to his serious drift away from Conservative principles.


29 posted on 04/13/2010 8:22:09 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (Democrat: Someone who supports killing children, but protests executing convicted murderers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

The Chinese are in the process of owning us. It’s only fair they get a representative on the court.


30 posted on 04/13/2010 8:22:40 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

http://www.jdforsenate.com/issues


31 posted on 04/13/2010 8:43:28 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

He sure is.


32 posted on 04/13/2010 10:15:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Be still & kneel before the know-nothing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr., may fleas be upon him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

He sure is.


33 posted on 04/13/2010 10:15:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Be still & kneel before the know-nothing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr., may fleas be upon him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; All

JD is doing the right thing by going after McCain.

Contrary to what some have posted....JD has to be strong on attack on McCain. You do not win elections by being a nice guy...never works.

Being weak in campaigns....well, it got the USA Obama....


34 posted on 04/13/2010 11:23:10 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD Hayworth for Senate ..... jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
honestly, who cares what any of you think. It’s up to us here in AZ.

LOL - well that's certainly a winning attitude. Much like a few Democrats I can think of.....
35 posted on 04/14/2010 4:12:02 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (There is no truth to the rumor that Ted Kennedy was buried at sea.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Dear Hildy,

The reason "why" it matters is because McNasty does not confine his votes to just the State of Arizona. The rest of us bubbas have to live with his wacky voting record.

That's "why" it matters. Regards, pointsal

36 posted on 04/14/2010 6:42:25 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson