Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax Complexity Adds Pain to Cash Drain (America has one of the world's most complicated tax code)
National Review ^ | 04/13/2010 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 04/13/2010 7:04:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

If the tax code were straightforward and simple, April 15 would be just another lovely spring date.

But as April 15 approaches like an incoming monsoon, millions of Americans brace for the pain of writing checks to the IRS. Even worse, this annual discomfort begins even earlier, as taxpayers generate a cyclone of documents just to calculate their tax liability. America’s excruciatingly complex tax-compliance regime deepens the aggravation of sending hard-earned cash to Washington for virtual incineration by Congress.

Completing tax forms required 7.75 billion hours of human labor in fiscal year 2008, according to the latest RegInfo.gov data. That roughly equals 3.7 million people — or everyone in Los Angeles — filling out IRS forms for 40 hours every week, all year, without vacations.

“That involves more workers than those at the Fortune 500’s five biggest employers,” the National Taxpayers Union’s David Keating concludes in a forthcoming report, “more than everybody at Wal-Mart, UPS, McDonald’s, IBM, and Citigroup combined.”

Keating also found that individual taxpayers will devote some 2.43 billion hours to grappling with the income tax in 2010 at an equivalent labor cost of $71.4 billion.

Add to this the $31.5 billion that individual taxpayers will cough up for tax software, accounting services, photocopying, and other compliance-related expenses. All told, individual taxpayers will spend $103 billion to determine how much more money they must pump into the Beltway.

Meanwhile, the IRS website now offers 1,909 different documents, up from 1,770 last year. These include the riveting “Form 8833: Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure Under Section 6114 or 7701(b).” And don’t miss “Form 990-W: Estimated Tax on Unrelated Business Taxable Income for Tax-Exempt Organizations.” This year’s basic 1040 tax return includes 76 lines and 174 pages of instructions, up from 68 lines and 52 pages in 1985.

Last year, NTU calculated that U.S. corporations spent $159.4 billion on tax compliance, equal to 54 percent of corporate-income-tax revenue. In 2008, General Electric’s tax return droned on for some 24,000 pages. If only all that energy had brought good things to life.

“America’s rankings in worldwide tax complexity have slipped — from 65th out of 181 last year to 69th out of 183 this year,” says NTU spokesman Pete Sepp. “On total tax rate alone, we dropped from 92nd out of 181 last year to 118th out of 183 today. So, we’ve gone from just barely in the worst half of tax rates to nearly the worst third. In 2009, 45 countries eased corporate taxpaying by cutting rates or streamlining procedures. America was not among them.”

“The biggest problem in terms of unintended consequences is the U.S. tax code’s constant changes,” says Alvin Rabushka, a senior fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, with which I am a media fellow. “Usually there are features of the tax code that change every year, such as the extension or non-extension of the Bush tax cuts. In each of the next few years, the tax code may change due to Obamacare. There may be environmental legislation that provides tax incentives and tax penalties.”

“If we had a good, medium-good, or not-so-good tax code, but it stayed the same, people could adjust to it,” Rabushka adds. “Instead, it’s a Darwinian survival of the fittest with people having to adapt year after year. This non-stop fiddling does nobody any good.”

The path out of this quagmire is an optional version of the flat tax, which Rabushka co-fathered, ideally at a 15 percent rate. Americans who find comfort in the U.S. tax code’s stultifying grandeur should be free to savor it and file their taxes accordingly. Everyone else should be free to complete a short, simple form with very few if any deductions.

Imagine combining a straightforward tax law, a single and low tax rate, and the freedom to choose between that approach and the status quo. Talk about a stimulus package! Even better, such a reform would turn April 15 into a relatively pleasant spring date rather than the scariest day of the year.

— Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: complexity; taxcode; taxes

1 posted on 04/13/2010 7:04:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

thats so your stealing government cand cheat you....


2 posted on 04/13/2010 7:12:55 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It has to be twisted to allow 47% of invcome earners to [pay no Fed income tax. Then they complain the people who are paying are not paying enough.


3 posted on 04/13/2010 7:21:06 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Tax Code is not designed for revenue but for social engineering, wasting people's time with busy work, frustrate people. If a foreign power imposed this byzantine system on us, it would be an act of war !

With my investments, this complex tax code has cost me $600 this year !
4 posted on 04/13/2010 7:21:12 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dools007

Would you vote for someone who proposed an ALTERNATIVE FILING SYSTEM ?

I was always for that.

You an choose to file the traditional way ( and wade through 10,000 pages of the tax code ( or pay your accountant to do it for you )), or you can file it the ALTERNATIVE WAY — THE FLAT WAY.

The first $36,000 is not taxed, and anything above that is taxed at 20%. NO DEDUCTIONS FOR THIS OR THAT, BUT ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTIONS ASKED. You get to file your taxes the size of a postcard.

Then let people choose how they want to file.

I’m sure if we experimented with this side-by-side system for 8 years, the traditional way of filing will (to quote Newt Gingrich) whither in the vine.


5 posted on 04/13/2010 7:30:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck

Would you vote for someone who proposed an ALTERNATIVE FILING SYSTEM ?

I was always for that.

You an choose to file the traditional way ( and wade through 10,000 pages of the tax code ( or pay your accountant to do it for you )), or you can file it the ALTERNATIVE WAY — THE FLAT WAY.

The first $36,000 is not taxed, and anything above that is taxed at 20%. NO DEDUCTIONS FOR THIS OR THAT, BUT ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTIONS ASKED. You get to file your taxes the size of a postcard.

Then let people choose how they want to file.

I’m sure if we experimented with this side-by-side system for 8 years, the traditional way of filing will (to quote Newt Gingrich) whither in the vine.


6 posted on 04/13/2010 7:30:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Our system certainly can’t be more cumbersome than a VAT.


7 posted on 04/13/2010 7:38:11 AM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/1980)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck
The Tax Code is not designed for revenue but for social engineering

It's designed for both. Too many powerful people benefit from the tax code the way it is to make changing to a logical, sensible flat tax politically possible. Legions of CPAs, tax attorneys and corporations that benefit from hidden tax incentives lobby every day to maintain the status quo.

8 posted on 04/13/2010 7:45:27 AM PDT by Bernard Marx (I donÂ’t trust the reasoning of anyone who writes then when they mean than.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The first $36,000 is not taxed”

Nope. They need skin in the game. They pay like everyone else.


9 posted on 04/13/2010 8:22:14 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m support a flat tax. Too many politicians—pubbie and demrat, do not because money is power. More money is more power.


10 posted on 04/13/2010 9:33:45 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You have my vote. :)


11 posted on 04/13/2010 9:36:13 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Albert Einstein-
[on filing for tax returns] “This is too difficult for a mathematician. It takes a philosopher.”

Milton Friedman-
“Congress can raise taxes because it can persuade a sizable fraction of the populace that somebody else will pay.”

Albert Einstein-
“The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax.”


12 posted on 04/15/2010 8:12:50 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson