To: D1X1E
Doesnt allow for the libs need to control others. I'm getting more incite from Sowell's "Intellectuals and Society". I used to think it was about control with elitist libs. I'm starting to move away from even THAT viewpoint. "Control" is an external concept, control over others.
What elitist libs are after is how they feel about THEMSELVES. It's all narcissism to them. Allowing others to make their own decisions provides no means by which elitist libs can feel good about themselves. That's the key.
52 posted on
04/13/2010 9:33:54 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
I used to think it was about control with elitist libs. I'm starting to move away from even THAT viewpoint. "Control" is an external concept, control over others. What elitist libs are after is how they feel about THEMSELVES. It's all narcissism to them. Allowing others to make their own decisions provides no means by which elitist libs can feel good about themselves.
hmmm makes some sense. I never did understand the big appeal of control. Have enough to do attending to my own business let alone anyone elses. But yes, the feeling better about themselves could enter into it. Doing something good for others could generate that same feeling and benefit someone else as well but the inherent selfishness of narcissism resists that idea I guess.
53 posted on
04/13/2010 9:51:09 AM PDT by
D1X1E
(Trust but verify... especially if you got your information from the government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson