Posted on 04/12/2010 2:23:07 PM PDT by kcvl
So THIS is how they plan to make healthcare better and more affordable and increase access to more people...
Wow, I feel good about myself, I don’t think I’ll examine the issue any deeper.
/libthink
It’s the thought that counts./sarc
CNSNews.com
Health Law Bans New Doctor-Owned Hospitals, Blocks Expansion of Existing Ones
Monday, April 12, 2010
By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer
(CNSNews.com) – The new health care overhaul law – that promised increased access and efficiency in health care – will prevent doctor-owned hospitals from adding more rooms and more beds.
These hospitals are advertised as less bureaucratic and more focused on doctor-patient decision making. However, larger corporate hospitals say doctor-owned facilities discriminate in favor of high-income patients and refer business to themselves.
The new rules single out physician-owned hospitals, making new physician-owned projects ineligible to receive payments for Medicare and Medicaid patients.
Existing doctor-owned hospitals will be grandfathered in to get government funds for patients but must seek permission from the Department of Health and Human Services to expand.
The get the department’s permission, a doctor-owned hospital must be in a county where population growth is 150 percent of the population growth of the state in the last five years; impatient admissions must be equal to all hospitals located in the county; the bed occupancy rate must not be greater than the state average, and it must be located in a state where hospital bed capacity is less than the national average.
These rules are under Title VI, Section 6001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The provision is titled “Physician Ownership and Other Transparency – Limitations on Medicare Exceptions to the Prohibition on Certain Physician Referral for Hospitals.”
More than 60 doctor-owned hospitals across the country that were in the development stage will be canceled, said Molly Sandvig, executive director of Physician Hospitals of America (PHA).
“That’s a lot of access to communities that will be denied,” Sandvig told CNSNews.com. “The existing hospitals are greatly affected. They can’t grow. They can’t add beds. They can’t add rooms. Basically, it stifles their ability to change and meet market needs. This is really an unfortunate thing as well, because we are talking about some of the best hospitals in the country.”
The organization says physician-owned hospitals have higher patient satisfaction, greater control over medical decisions for patients and doctor, better quality care and lower costs. Further, physician-owned hospitals have an average 4-1 patient-to-nurse ratio, compared to the national average of 8-1 for general hospitals.
Further, these 260 doctor-owned hospitals in 38 states provide 55,000 jobs, $2.4 billion in payroll and pay $509 million in federal taxes, according to the PHA.
In one ironic aspect, President Barack Obama’s two largest legislative achievements clashed. The Hammond Community Hospital in North Hammond, Ind., got $7 million in bond money from the federal stimulus act in 2009. It will likely be scrapped because of the new rules on physician-owned hospitals, according to the Post-Tribune newspaper in Merrillville, Ind.
These hospitals have long been a target of the American Hospital Association, which represents corporate-owned hospitals as well as non-profit hospitals.
An AHA study from 2008 says that physician-owned hospitals “lessen patient access to emergency and trauma case;” “damage the financial health of full-service hospitals and lead to cutbacks in service;” “are not more efficient than full service community hospitals;” “use physician-owners to steer patients;” “cherry pick the most profitable patients;” and “provide limited or no emergency services.”
Meanwhile, one AHA fact sheet asserts that physician-owned orthopedic and surgical hospitals costs are 20 percent to 30 percent higher than average hospitals. Further, these hospitals just lead to higher profits for doctors, the AHA asserts.
“We don’t cherry pick patients, period, end of story. We take patients based on their need for care, not on their ability to pay,” Sandvig said. “It [the health care reform] puts control outside the hand of physicians and patients and into bureaucrats’ hands really.
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is one of many organizations suing to have the law declared unconstitutional on the grounds that the federal government cannot compel someone to buy a product.
While the provision on physician hospitals is not part of the lawsuit, it will affect it, Dr. said Jane Orient, AAPS executive director.
“If the law is declared unconstitutional, then the prohibition is part of the bill,” Orient told CNSNews.com. “There are vested interests in getting rid of physician-owned hospitals because they do a better job and are more affordable.”
The provision in the legislation and efforts opposing these hospitals can be simply explained from Sandvig’s view.
“It’s anti-competitive. I think it’s pretty clear,” Sandvig said. “We’re a model that makes sense that’s affecting innovation. We’re trying to do something better than it has been done. Anytime you do that, there’s going to be a clash between the existing and the new. Unfortunately, it’s a real David and Goliath battle.”
CNSNews.com - Health Law Bans New Doctor-Owned Hospitals, Blocks Expansion of Existing Ones
Watch out hospital CEOs. The nose will be summoning you to correct your thinking.
More than 60 doctor-owned hospitals across the country that were in the development stage will be canceled, said Molly Sandvig, executive director of ...
The nose will be summoning you to correct your thinking.
Yes he will.
And guess who that hurts?!/s
Choices for Medicare & Medicaid patients just got smaller! Get in line at the GOVERNMENT APPROVED HOSPITAL if you have either Medicare or Medicaid!
A - effin’ - mazing...I represent docs. It’s tough enough to get through the maze already.
Colonel, USAFR
It’s because they’re racist.
Old folks in wheel chairs are going to start raising hell.
BUT, Obama said there was no rationing! /s
He said everyone would have a choice. He just forgot to tell everyone that choice would be from an APPROVED GOVERNMENT LIST if you expect Medicare &/or Medicaid to pay for it!
So, does this increase or limit my choice. The question is rhetorical.
This is really, REALLY disgusting.
Unless we evict the Communists from our government we are doomed.
Pop Quiz:
What happens to prices / costs when supply is reduced?
All those construction workers will simply get “green jobs” somewhere else.
“you might choose wrong” to paraphrase Bill Clinton
I brought up all these questions to my benchmark lib -
there are going to be fewer doctors and less resources and more people “with access” - how does rationing NOT happen.
“Oh, I’m sure they know these things and have them figured out.”
I’ve read about a number of these doctros’ hospitals that are under construction, and literally frozen in partially finished conditions. I don’t really know the particulars, but some number of these buildings-in-progress have essentially become illegal or impossible to operate feasibly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.