Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House kills Hillary SCOTUS buzz
Politico ^

Posted on 04/12/2010 10:36:33 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

White House kills Hillary SCOTUS buzz

The White House moved quickly today to squelch the widening speculation that Hillary Clinton could be nominated to the Supreme Court, as Senator Orrin Hatch suggested this morning.

"The President thinks Secretary Clinton is doing an excellent job as Secretary of State and wants her to remain in that position," said White House spokesman Tommy Vietor.

Clinton's spokesman had said she was flattered by Hatch's flotation, though happy in her current posts, and others in Clinton's circle had quietly responded warmly to the notion.

But Veitor's comment is aimed at putting an end to the speculation.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhojudicialnominees; bhoscotus; soshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Sub-Driver

Reopening old Democrat party wounds, I should say.


21 posted on 04/12/2010 11:10:36 AM PDT by counterpunch (The Emperor has no Cloture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Well, by those standards, the entire Left half of Congress is eligible. ;-)


22 posted on 04/12/2010 11:13:42 AM PDT by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Jeez Louise, that’s the worst ever.


23 posted on 04/12/2010 11:20:16 AM PDT by bergmeid (Fumigate Washington NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
24 posted on 04/12/2010 11:21:45 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sthguard

“Does HRC even have any judicial experience?”

While it’s true that every sitting justice has such experience, it’s NOT a necessary prerequisite for appointment to the Court. Justice Black, for example, was appointed directly from the Senate; Justice Douglas was appointed directly from being head of SEC etc. I think it would be a stretch to appoint someone without legal training, but Hillary has that and even had “real” practical experience as a lawyer, however limited or ethically questionable. Of course, Republicans in theory could have a field day with the Rose Law firm billing records, which would be one reason HRC might think twice about leaping at any such opportunity.


25 posted on 04/12/2010 11:22:40 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DrC

I think Hugo Black was replaced by Lewis Powell, who was replaced by Anthony Kennedy. If it were Kennedy’s seat that was opening up, then Robert C. Byrd would be the obvious choice (for the “Klan seat”).


26 posted on 04/12/2010 11:29:28 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sthguard

“That would be a leap of incompetence, even for Obama. Does HRC even have any judicial experience?”

Experience is not even necessary if you are “politically reliable”. That was SOP in the Soviet Union.


27 posted on 04/12/2010 11:30:26 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“”The President thinks Secretary Clinton is doing an excellent job as Secretary of State and wants her to remain in that position,”

Translation by Mr. Subliminal: “The President thinks Secretary Clinton is doing an excellent [barely passable] job as Secretary of State [BTW, BHO could do WAY better if HE were in that lowly position] and wants her to remain [trapped helpless] in that position [as it would be quite useful to have someone to blame as various time-bombs in Iran, N. Korea, Afghanistan and Taiwan detonate prior to 2012. Mr. Emanuel has pointed out that it would be a shame to waste such crises, as his years in Chicago have taught him and the President the usefulness of this sort of payback in deterring future political opponents from daring to challenge the President’s greatness].”


28 posted on 04/12/2010 11:35:07 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t know why Obama wouldn’t at least try to put her on the Supreme Court. I don’t doubt for a minute that she is thinking about another run in 2012. She can read the poll numbers as well as we can.


29 posted on 04/12/2010 12:09:54 PM PDT by CarWashMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi; bergmeid

“Betcha she’s stomping her little hooves over this.”

Or not

Odds of A ‘Justice Clinton’? ‘Probably Zero,’ Hillary Says
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=37470


30 posted on 04/12/2010 12:12:54 PM PDT by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"The President thinks Secretary Clinton is doing an excellent job as Secretary of State and wants her to remain in that position," said White House spokesman Tommy Vietor.

< snicker >

31 posted on 04/12/2010 12:16:56 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

Hillary was on one of the talking head Sunday shows yesterday. I remember commenting to the wife, “Jeeze, you’d think she could wash her hair & put on some makeup before appearing on a scheduled broadcast like this.” I’d say that Hillary just doesn’t give a fig about actually performing as SoS. She only took the job to burnish her resume. Her eyes are still firmly on the top job. She’ll be resigning soon in preparation for her run.


32 posted on 04/12/2010 12:19:37 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, I dunno... IF the 0bama Administration denies something is going to happen, isn’t it axiomatic that it must be true, or at least under consideration?


33 posted on 04/12/2010 2:26:19 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson