Ron Paul called Reagan an failure, economically. He would have us be a rogue nation with drug law repeal. Some issues are worth going rogue on...Anti-global warming, Christian principals, the death penalty, low taxes,...but heroine and cocaine...no. Hypocritical on earmarks when it comes to the shrimp industry. He wants to tax the hell out of corporations and impose tariffs. Goodbye to jobs if that were to be passed. He opposes the Patriot Act, so, so much for your criticism on Bush over security...Paul would have done less. So, no I certainly do not support Ron Paul and his domestic job killing, drug-addicted teen policies.
It isn’t “the terrorist business”. It’s the Jihad business. “Terrorism” is a TACTIC. If you don’t understand the roots of this war, you really need to do some reading.
Spoken like a Paul nut...I thought you said you don't support his foreign ideas. Certain people do terrorism and they are the ones that Bush spent 7 years killing.
There have been a number of terrorist attacks in the United States since 9-11. Just not as large. Putting CAIR in bed with the FBI and increasing Muslim immigration was the very height of stupidity. Not correcting the visa overstay problem and border security was dereliction of duty.
Large scale terrorist attacks took place against us till 9-11...none since. So Bush was the only president that was right in his tactics and that will never change since Obama has rolled back the Bush policies and now he owns the issue and will own it when his actions cause a large-scale attack.
It’s clear you don’t understand this conflict and don’t intend to. You think it’s just about bin Laden. It’s not.
It's clear you're a liar. I have said since the beginning this is large scale and that Saddam was just as involved as bin Laden. You live in an alternate reality where results don't have to back up your assertions. Bush was the only president to end the large-scale attacks and that will never change.
” He would have us be a rogue nation with drug law repeal. “
Were we a “rogue nation” before drug laws? Are we not a “rogue nation” with dynamic-entry raids across the country that get people killed? You prefer militarized police? That’s the standing army the Founders warned about, after all.
“Goodbye to jobs if that were to be passed”
We’ve already said “goodbye” to jobs after decades of trade deals that used trade as a political tool. Before the income tax, tariffs were one of the only Constitutional sources of income for the federal government.
” He opposes the Patriot Act, so, so much for your criticism on Bush over security.”
Quite a few on the right oppose the Patriot Act as it will and has been mostly used against non-terrorists. With any law, remember that it will eventually be enforced by your worst enemy. Your proof that the “Patriot Act” makes us safe when we STILL DO NOT ENFORCE VISA LAWS?!
“So, no I certainly do not support Ron Paul and his domestic job killing, drug-addicted teen policies.”
Federal regulations are what is killing jobs. Bad parents are what causes “drug-addicted” teens. Parents who expect Nanny Government to raise their kids.
“Large scale terrorist attacks took place against us till 9-11...none since. So Bush was the only president that was right in his tactics and that will never change since Obama has rolled back the Bush policies and now he owns the issue and will own it when his actions cause a large-scale attack.”
There was a long gulf between the first Trade Center bombinb and 9-11 too. Did Clinton’s policies keep us “safe”?
“It’s clear you’re a liar. I have said since the beginning this is large scale and that Saddam was just as involved as bin Laden. You live in an alternate reality where results don’t have to back up your assertions. Bush was the only president to end the large-scale attacks and that will never change”
OK, it’s clear you are an idiot. Saddam and bin Laden were involved, but you completely miss the point that the freaking root problem is ISLAM and its expansion and that is funded by Saudi Arabia! If Bush “ended the large-scale attacks” then so did Clinton. Your argument doesn’t hold water. Try to be more conservative and less partisan.