” He would have us be a rogue nation with drug law repeal. “
Were we a “rogue nation” before drug laws? Are we not a “rogue nation” with dynamic-entry raids across the country that get people killed? You prefer militarized police? That’s the standing army the Founders warned about, after all.
“Goodbye to jobs if that were to be passed”
We’ve already said “goodbye” to jobs after decades of trade deals that used trade as a political tool. Before the income tax, tariffs were one of the only Constitutional sources of income for the federal government.
” He opposes the Patriot Act, so, so much for your criticism on Bush over security.”
Quite a few on the right oppose the Patriot Act as it will and has been mostly used against non-terrorists. With any law, remember that it will eventually be enforced by your worst enemy. Your proof that the “Patriot Act” makes us safe when we STILL DO NOT ENFORCE VISA LAWS?!
“So, no I certainly do not support Ron Paul and his domestic job killing, drug-addicted teen policies.”
Federal regulations are what is killing jobs. Bad parents are what causes “drug-addicted” teens. Parents who expect Nanny Government to raise their kids.
“Large scale terrorist attacks took place against us till 9-11...none since. So Bush was the only president that was right in his tactics and that will never change since Obama has rolled back the Bush policies and now he owns the issue and will own it when his actions cause a large-scale attack.”
There was a long gulf between the first Trade Center bombinb and 9-11 too. Did Clinton’s policies keep us “safe”?
“It’s clear you’re a liar. I have said since the beginning this is large scale and that Saddam was just as involved as bin Laden. You live in an alternate reality where results don’t have to back up your assertions. Bush was the only president to end the large-scale attacks and that will never change”
OK, it’s clear you are an idiot. Saddam and bin Laden were involved, but you completely miss the point that the freaking root problem is ISLAM and its expansion and that is funded by Saudi Arabia! If Bush “ended the large-scale attacks” then so did Clinton. Your argument doesn’t hold water. Try to be more conservative and less partisan.
The statements in your posts before this one are anti-drug law, pro-protectionist, anti-Patriot Act, libertarian non-reality based crap that is irreconcilable to me. I'll never be a libertarian as you are and and you'll never be a biblical conservative as I am and everyone has made up their mind on that stuff so it's a waste of electrons to go through it point by point.
There was not a long gulf between major terrorist attacks on us. We had one about once per year. Bush ended that in 2001.
OK, it’s clear you are an idiot. Saddam and bin Laden were involved, but you completely miss the point that the freaking root problem is ISLAM and its expansion and that is funded by Saudi Arabia! If Bush “ended the large-scale attacks” then so did Clinton. Your argument doesn’t hold water. Try to be more conservative and less partisan.
Yes Islam is the problem and it was Bush that got them under control. We had major attacks all through Clinton's term. Oklahoma City was a Saddam operation using anti-Iraq war nut McVeigh (whose views on foreign policy resemble Ron Paul's), the towers attack, the Cole. Were you asleep during all this?