“Every claim you make is a leap. lol”
Again, nonsense.
“9-11 was the only attack, proving there was nothing of the sort that you speak of.”
What?! Surely you can’t be serious?
“It, like the barracks attack, was an event to rise to the occasion to. Bush succeeded, Reagan failed.”
By telling America to go shopping and praising Islam.
“Are you a Paul supporter?”
I support his domestic ideas. If you don’t, you aren’t a conservative. I don’t support much of his foreign policy.
“That “single attack” was solid proof of who were the head honchos in the terrorist business. And Bush took care of business, killing Saddam and his sons, and killing bin Laden in Tora Bora. Other presidents did nothing.”
It isn’t “the terrorist business”. It’s the Jihad business. “Terrorism” is a TACTIC. If you don’t understand the roots of this war, you really need to do some reading.
“Results prove otherwise. No attacks mean Bush was right in his efforts.”
There have been a number of terrorist attacks in the United States since 9-11. Just not as large. Putting CAIR in bed with the FBI and increasing Muslim immigration was the very height of stupidity. Not correcting the visa overstay problem and border security was dereliction of duty.
It’s clear you don’t understand this conflict and don’t intend to. You think it’s just about bin Laden. It’s not.
Ron Paul called Reagan an failure, economically. He would have us be a rogue nation with drug law repeal. Some issues are worth going rogue on...Anti-global warming, Christian principals, the death penalty, low taxes,...but heroine and cocaine...no. Hypocritical on earmarks when it comes to the shrimp industry. He wants to tax the hell out of corporations and impose tariffs. Goodbye to jobs if that were to be passed. He opposes the Patriot Act, so, so much for your criticism on Bush over security...Paul would have done less. So, no I certainly do not support Ron Paul and his domestic job killing, drug-addicted teen policies.
It isn’t “the terrorist business”. It’s the Jihad business. “Terrorism” is a TACTIC. If you don’t understand the roots of this war, you really need to do some reading.
Spoken like a Paul nut...I thought you said you don't support his foreign ideas. Certain people do terrorism and they are the ones that Bush spent 7 years killing.
There have been a number of terrorist attacks in the United States since 9-11. Just not as large. Putting CAIR in bed with the FBI and increasing Muslim immigration was the very height of stupidity. Not correcting the visa overstay problem and border security was dereliction of duty.
Large scale terrorist attacks took place against us till 9-11...none since. So Bush was the only president that was right in his tactics and that will never change since Obama has rolled back the Bush policies and now he owns the issue and will own it when his actions cause a large-scale attack.
It’s clear you don’t understand this conflict and don’t intend to. You think it’s just about bin Laden. It’s not.
It's clear you're a liar. I have said since the beginning this is large scale and that Saddam was just as involved as bin Laden. You live in an alternate reality where results don't have to back up your assertions. Bush was the only president to end the large-scale attacks and that will never change.