To: throwback
I can see all the others on the list, but the F-250? I’m puzzled by that. I never owned one, but I’ve been in several and know folks who have them.
jw
10 posted on
04/12/2010 8:19:09 AM PDT by
JWinNC
(www.anailinhisplace.net)
To: JWinNC
I was puzzled, too, until I saw that they were relying on “Consumer Reports”, an entity which I not merely do not respect, but actively hold in contempt.
15 posted on
04/12/2010 8:23:26 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: JWinNC
I can see all the others on the list, but the F-250? Im puzzled by that. I suspect the rating on the F-250 has a lot to do with the 6.4L Powerstroke engine. They were very unreliable, very costly to repair and nothing at all like the previous 7.3L in terms of longevity.
32 posted on
04/12/2010 8:42:04 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
To: JWinNC
but the F-250.... There was a comment on another thread that said something about the 250 serving the niche market of states that required a commercial license to drive the F-350. Said that the 350 was a better truck, for about $1000 more.
I dunno, I've never driven either one of them. Just repeating what was said.
42 posted on
04/12/2010 8:53:20 AM PDT by
wbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson