Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JWinNC
I can see all the others on the list, but the F-250? I’m puzzled by that.

I suspect the rating on the F-250 has a lot to do with the 6.4L Powerstroke engine. They were very unreliable, very costly to repair and nothing at all like the previous 7.3L in terms of longevity.

32 posted on 04/12/2010 8:42:04 AM PDT by IamConservative (Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: IamConservative

That would explain it... I’ve also heard that they had trouble or messed up the diesels.

jw


113 posted on 04/12/2010 10:46:12 AM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: IamConservative

“I suspect the rating on the F-250 has a lot to do with the 6.4L Powerstroke engine.”

I have the 7.3 in a 1996 E350 van. Runs like a top, lots of pep, and gets good mileage. They shouldn’t have changed. Probably the EPA made them.


155 posted on 04/12/2010 7:33:49 PM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson