[ETL]

Your argument is thus:
“Obama was pro-Soviet, THEREFORE he could not be an operative for the CIA.”

Not in the least bit likely against the Soviet Union.

[ETL]

BTW: Reverend Manning also claims Obama is a "Mack Daddy" for using "trashy white women" to endorse his 2008 election. Manning seems to dislike Obama mainly because his mother was white. He actually calls Obama "White trash". Watch and listen to the linked youtube video and see for yourself.

"Obama ain't nothing but a long-legged Mack Daddy!"--Rev Manning

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hfZqMkdpYi0

[Hostage]

In the context of an Agency contract, it doesn’t matter if he was for or against the Soviets.

The Agency employs many rabble rousers, students sporting T-Shirts of “Che!” and so on. It does this for its purposes.

The Agency also employs many little old ladies with blue hair as well as small-framed janitors with speech impediments.

The Agency makes it their business to employ people from all walks of life so that no one will suspect who is an agent.

Many college professors are agents.

Many international shippers are employees of the Agency.

And so on.

The point is your argument doesn’t cut it, and that’s a fact.

Now as to Manning, his argument may not cut it as well. But we are going to hear his evidence.

But you know what? Even if Manning’s evidence doesn’t cut it, we need to back him because the socialists in the media are going to attempt to smear him, disparage him and we need to show the media the middle-finger salute, and tell them don’t even bother trying to divide us.