Skip to comments.
Goodbye To Another Unprincipled Democrat
Washington Times ^
| April 9, 2010
| Editorial staff
Posted on 04/09/2010 6:43:28 PM PDT by raptor22
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
04/09/2010 6:43:28 PM PDT
by
raptor22
To: raptor22
Unprincipled DemocratBad editing. That's a redundancy.
2
posted on
04/09/2010 6:46:32 PM PDT
by
fullchroma
(Obama: GET OUT OF MY DOCTOR'S OFFICE!)
To: raptor22
Like everybody else, I just can’t wait to see the cushy job the Obama gang has lined up for Bart after he leaves.
2010 is mucho importante in that regard. All the Hill players will be watching to make sure the Obamites and their cronies keep their promises.
3
posted on
04/09/2010 6:46:32 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: raptor22
I hope SOMEONE is watching what kind of position this shameless whore lands after his term ends.
4
posted on
04/09/2010 6:47:07 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
To: raptor22
When will 'the other feckless "anti-abortion" Democrat holdouts' announce that they will drop out of the next election?
5
posted on
04/09/2010 6:49:03 PM PDT
by
eeriegeno
(<p>)
To: fullchroma; raptor22
Keep in mind, it doesn’t have to be in goobermint or in a “K” street lobbying shop.
In this new era of Mussolini corporatism there are all those big businesses suckling at the state teat. Heck, Jeffrey Immelt alone could find nice corner office spots for all the House lackeys in the General Electric empire.
6
posted on
04/09/2010 6:49:19 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: EyeGuy
Although I doubt anything could be quite as shameless as former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder landing a cushy spot in Russia’s GAZPROM right after shilling for them unofficially in his former position...
7
posted on
04/09/2010 6:51:36 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: EyeGuy
Nosed me out by 35 seconds.
Good thoughts. LOL.
I think Stupak is now living in a glass house, but the Democrats are not only shameless, but fearless, thanks to the utter lack of balls in the Republican Party.
8
posted on
04/09/2010 6:58:35 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
To: EyeGuy
Boy, me too. If it’s anything to do with any government job I hope he’s blocked. I hope he can’t get a booking to give speeches...
9
posted on
04/09/2010 7:15:56 PM PDT
by
hstacey
To: raptor22
To: EyeGuy
I hope SOMEONE is watching what kind of position this shameless whore lands after his term ends.
Stupak or from the dictionary - (#3 seems to fit him best!) whore noun (plural whores) 1. an offensive term for a prostitute 2. an offensive term for somebody regarded as being sexually indiscriminate 3. an offensive term for somebody who is regarded as willing to set aside principles or personal integrity in order to obtain something, usually for selfish motives
|
|
|
11
posted on
04/09/2010 7:35:32 PM PDT
by
B-Cause
(Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: raptor22
good riddance one more rat erradicated!!.. several yet to go.
To: raptor22
Wonder what his payoff is to be the fall guy.
Of course, to the rest of us he is nothing but scum at the bottom of the bucket.
13
posted on
04/09/2010 7:40:44 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: sinanju
I’m not convinced he’ll stay in DC. Eighteen years of the place is enough to drive most people bat crazy.
14
posted on
04/09/2010 7:45:53 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(I'm against a homogenized society because I want the cream to rise. --Robert Frost)
To: raptor22
15
posted on
04/09/2010 7:51:00 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: raptor22
16
posted on
04/09/2010 7:51:01 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: B-Cause
an offensive term for somebody who is regarded as willing to set aside principles or personal integrity This assumes he has principles or personal integrity in the first place.
17
posted on
04/09/2010 8:04:58 PM PDT
by
paudio
(Are you better off today than in 2006, when the Democrats took over the Congress?)
To: fullchroma
“That’s a redundancy.”
The author is a member of the Department of Redundancy Department.
To: raptor22
Stupak made an interesting off the cuff remark in a hallway during the thick of the healthcare push.
He said, “members have been threatened with charges of ethics violations and such”.
I wonder if the Chicago mob in the WH told him about some unflattering info they had on him.
To: raptor22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson