Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye To Another Unprincipled Democrat
Washington Times ^ | April 9, 2010 | Editorial staff

Posted on 04/09/2010 6:43:28 PM PDT by raptor22

Rep. Bart Stupak's announcement today that he will not seek re-election is no big surprise. The Michigan Democrat dug himself into a deep political hole and and couldn't climb out of it. Mr. Stupak repeatedly vowed that he would never vote for government-funded abortion. When he sold out that principle, the whole country - including his vast rural district - knew he singlehandedly pushed Obamacare over the top for passage.

Mr. Stupak first claimed he wasn't violating his pro-life pledge because of an executive order President Obama said he'd sign to maintain the Hyde Amendment, which forbids public funding when a pregnancy purportedly isn't the result of rape or incest. This explanation was never very convincing. It was crystal clear that Mr. Obama's order was merely a fig leaf that gave nothing to Mr. Stupak and the other feckless "anti-abortion" Democrat holdouts. The executive order included nothing beyond what was already in the Senate version of the health bill, and that bill contained provisions that Mr. Stupak repeatedly had rejected because it provided government funding for abortion.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 111th; bartstupak; demcare; democrat; democrats; obamacare; stupak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2010 6:43:28 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Unprincipled Democrat

Bad editing. That's a redundancy.

2 posted on 04/09/2010 6:46:32 PM PDT by fullchroma (Obama: GET OUT OF MY DOCTOR'S OFFICE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Like everybody else, I just can’t wait to see the cushy job the Obama gang has lined up for Bart after he leaves.

2010 is mucho importante in that regard. All the Hill players will be watching to make sure the Obamites and their cronies keep their promises.


3 posted on 04/09/2010 6:46:32 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

I hope SOMEONE is watching what kind of position this shameless whore lands after his term ends.


4 posted on 04/09/2010 6:47:07 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
When will 'the other feckless "anti-abortion" Democrat holdouts' announce that they will drop out of the next election?
5 posted on 04/09/2010 6:49:03 PM PDT by eeriegeno (<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma; raptor22

Keep in mind, it doesn’t have to be in goobermint or in a “K” street lobbying shop.

In this new era of Mussolini corporatism there are all those big businesses suckling at the state teat. Heck, Jeffrey Immelt alone could find nice corner office spots for all the House lackeys in the General Electric empire.


6 posted on 04/09/2010 6:49:19 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

Although I doubt anything could be quite as shameless as former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder landing a cushy spot in Russia’s GAZPROM right after shilling for them unofficially in his former position...


7 posted on 04/09/2010 6:51:36 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

Nosed me out by 35 seconds.

Good thoughts. LOL.

I think Stupak is now living in a glass house, but the Democrats are not only shameless, but fearless, thanks to the utter lack of balls in the Republican Party.


8 posted on 04/09/2010 6:58:35 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

Boy, me too. If it’s anything to do with any government job I hope he’s blocked. I hope he can’t get a booking to give speeches...


9 posted on 04/09/2010 7:15:56 PM PDT by hstacey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

slam.


10 posted on 04/09/2010 7:27:32 PM PDT by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
I hope SOMEONE is watching what kind of position this shameless whore lands after his term ends.


Stupak
or from the dictionary - (#3 seems to fit him best!)
whore
noun (plural whores)
1. an offensive term for a prostitute
2. an offensive term for somebody regarded as being sexually indiscriminate
3. an offensive term for somebody who is regarded as willing to set aside principles or personal integrity in order to obtain something, usually for selfish motives



11 posted on 04/09/2010 7:35:32 PM PDT by B-Cause (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

good riddance one more rat erradicated!!.. several yet to go.


12 posted on 04/09/2010 7:35:41 PM PDT by rosco coltrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Wonder what his payoff is to be the fall guy.

Of course, to the rest of us he is nothing but scum at the bottom of the bucket.


13 posted on 04/09/2010 7:40:44 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I’m not convinced he’ll stay in DC. Eighteen years of the place is enough to drive most people bat crazy.


14 posted on 04/09/2010 7:45:53 PM PDT by freespirited (I'm against a homogenized society because I want the cream to rise. --Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Bump.


15 posted on 04/09/2010 7:51:00 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Bump.


16 posted on 04/09/2010 7:51:01 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Cause
an offensive term for somebody who is regarded as willing to set aside principles or personal integrity

This assumes he has principles or personal integrity in the first place.

17 posted on 04/09/2010 8:04:58 PM PDT by paudio (Are you better off today than in 2006, when the Democrats took over the Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

“That’s a redundancy.”

The author is a member of the Department of Redundancy Department.


18 posted on 04/10/2010 6:26:42 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Stupak made an interesting off the cuff remark in a hallway during the thick of the healthcare push.

He said, “members have been threatened with charges of ethics violations and such”.

I wonder if the Chicago mob in the WH told him about some unflattering info they had on him.


19 posted on 04/10/2010 6:29:14 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Stupak ist kaput(S)


20 posted on 04/10/2010 9:23:19 AM PDT by RunForesterRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson