Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
That's never been proven.

Moving the goalposts. All of the available evidence says that your two statements are incorrect. You have no evidence to support their accuracy or factual validity. The lack of supporting evidence and the existence of contradictory evidence is a strong showing that you're wrong.

Sorry, but I don't believe that. The reporter claimed that he found the part about Obama's birth in Indonesia on the Internet. That doesn't wash.

Argument from personal incredulity. Unless you want to claim that the author is lying about where he got "Indonesia" from, and advance some plausible hypothesis as to why he would lie, it seems the only reason you don't believe him is because his confession does not sync with your preexisting hypothesis.

And why would it be implausible that he found the part about an Indonesian birth on the internet? Isn't that where you found it? The internet is awash with bad information. The difference is that the Duckworth article's author, when confronted with new evidence showing his original assumption was wrong, issued a correction.

Several places reported it, until Obama settled one place and had 'corrections' made. Here's a story about it:

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2009/090715/webonlynews.html

Did you read that article before linking to it? Because there are no references in that article to instances where Obama reported having been born in any hospital other than Kapiolani. ZERO.

You've repeated a few times now that Obama reported more than one hospital as his place of birth. Above, you claim that several places have reported this. Can you provide even ONE real example of Obama identifying a hospital other than Queens? Just one?

527 posted on 04/11/2010 12:19:27 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies ]


To: LorenC
Moving the goalposts. All of the available evidence says that your two statements are incorrect. You have no evidence to support their accuracy or factual validity. The lack of supporting evidence and the existence of contradictory evidence is a strong showing that you're wrong.

I moved no goalposts. The only person lacking evidence is Obama at proving he was born in Hawaii. So far there is none.

Unless you want to claim that the author is lying about where he got "Indonesia" from, and advance some plausible hypothesis as to why he would lie, it seems the only reason you don't believe him is because his confession does not sync with your preexisting hypothesis.

Find his source for his claim that he read somewhere on the Interent that Obama was born in Indonesia.

Because there are no references in that article to instances where Obama reported having been born in any hospital other than Kapiolani. ZERO.

Friend, you need to do a better job of reading. “Obama described his birth at Queen’s Medical Center in Hawaii …” That is a direct attribution. I remember this article being online before it was 'corrected.' Sorry to destroy your faith in Obama.

565 posted on 04/11/2010 4:24:55 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson