Replies

I hate to break it to you, but there is no reason to believe Obama wasn’t born in the US with an American mother. You can debate if that is good enough, but it was good enough for the American people (who elected him), the US Congress, and the Supreme Court.

If the LTC doesn’t agree, he should have put in his papers when it became obvious Obama was going to be installed as President. But he’s been taking the Queen’s shilling, so now it is time to do her bidding - so to speak. He had the option of getting out, but CHOSE not to do so.

No sympathy for him from me. Sorry.

I hate to break it to you, but there is no reason to believe Obama wasn’t born in the US with an American mother.

There are a myriad of reasons. His mother's whereabouts at the time of birth are not documented. His step-grandmother says he is a son of Kenyan soil. His own wife says Kenya is his home country. Tammy Duckworth says he was born in Indonesia. Obama gave conflicting accounts about which hospital he was allegedly born in. The state of HI refuses to confirm that his alleged COLB is real. He has a certificate number that is most likely fraudulent. Hawaiian birth certificates are easily obtainable for people born out of state. What we have is little reason to conclude that Obama was born in the U.S. with an American mother. The evidence is sparse and uncompelling.

I hate to break it to you, but there is no reason to believe Obama wasn’t born in the US with an American mother ...

Bwa-ha-ha!

You still think this is about the birth certificate ...
... and his American mother.

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Mr Rogers said: "If the LTC doesn’t agree, he should have put in his papers when it became obvious Obama was going to be installed as President. "

You seem to be confusing a couple of facts.

The first fact is whether or not Obama is a natural-born citizen. That is either true or false.

The second fact is that the Constitution requires that the President be a natural-born citizen. That fact is true.

I certainly don't think that our Founders would have included that requirement without every expectation that it was an enforceable requirement.

The government power to hide public records such as those that would establish the details of Obama's birth is of relatively recent origin. Such power has been justified on the basis of preventing identity theft, perhaps among other reasons. None of these reasons justify the withholding of ANY information about the person claiming the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

I don't know all of the relevant details of Obama's birth. I have a right to know. The Constitution is not subject to majority rule. The requirements for eligibility for the Presidency cannot be eliminated without amending the Constitution.