Mr Rogers said:
"If the LTC doesn’t agree, he should have put in his papers when it became obvious Obama was going to be installed as President. " You seem to be confusing a couple of facts.
The first fact is whether or not Obama is a natural-born citizen. That is either true or false.
The second fact is that the Constitution requires that the President be a natural-born citizen. That fact is true.
I certainly don't think that our Founders would have included that requirement without every expectation that it was an enforceable requirement.
The government power to hide public records such as those that would establish the details of Obama's birth is of relatively recent origin. Such power has been justified on the basis of preventing identity theft, perhaps among other reasons. None of these reasons justify the withholding of ANY information about the person claiming the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.
I don't know all of the relevant details of Obama's birth. I have a right to know. The Constitution is not subject to majority rule. The requirements for eligibility for the Presidency cannot be eliminated without amending the Constitution.
