Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

“Cigarette smoking is responsible for 90% of all lung cancer cases in the United States.

Still, only 10 to 20% of smokers actually develop lung cancer, begging the question: Why do some smokers succumb to the disease and others don’t.”

This doesn’t make sense to me. 10-20% of smokers develop lung cancer, and apparently smoking isn’t related to 10% (100 minus 90), so how are they certain that smoking causes 90% of lung cancer. Not saying that they are wrong, it just seems... off.


6 posted on 04/09/2010 3:16:06 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: autumnraine
I pretty much wrote the same thing....

The scientific profession has made themselves "cigarette dependent" for their work...It's the first question the doctor asks...and it infuriates me...It creates a STRONG bias in examination.

8 posted on 04/09/2010 3:23:54 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

I’ve known people who died from lung cancer who never smoked. They were probably in that 10% that this article references. The question remains: were they exposed to 2nd hand smoke? Poor air quality in their communities? What?

Before rules were enforced to curtail workplace smoking, I worked in some places that were just awful with smoke — a Boy Scout office was one. It was located in the basement of a church with poor ventilation. When you came inside it looked like you were stepping into a fog, the smoke was so thick from my 2 co-workers.

Another really bad environment was at a newspaper. The publisher was the worst — smoked like a chimney all the time. We’d all be working together to get the paper “to bed” and the smoke was dreadful.

My aunt succumbed to emphysema attributed to her husband’s continuous smoking.


9 posted on 04/09/2010 3:25:10 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
"This doesn’t make sense to me. 10-20% of smokers develop lung cancer, and apparently smoking isn’t related to 10% (100 minus 90), so how are they certain that smoking causes 90% of lung cancer. Not saying that they are wrong, it just seems... off."

Many types of cancers from other organs can migrate to the lungs.

23 posted on 04/09/2010 3:50:20 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
Apples and oranges. Of the total population of lung cancer victims...90% are smokers. Ten percent of lung cancer victims are not smokers. Total population of lung cancer victims 100%. Now, only 10-20% of the total population of smokers fall victim to lung cancer. These are not the same percentages. See? :D)
25 posted on 04/09/2010 3:57:44 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
Still, only 10 to 20% of smokers actually develop lung cancer, begging the question: Why do some smokers succumb to the disease and others don’t.”

I have an aunt who is approx. 80 years old who once smoked many years ago, developed lung cancer in her later years and has had a full recovery following treatment.........She is one amazing woman......

But to answer your question, why do people who have never smoked develope lung cancer or emphysema anyway?

Some people get fat, some people don't, some people are allergic to latex, most people aren't.

I'm thinking that the medical and scientific community are now getting too big for their britches..........

31 posted on 04/09/2010 4:50:24 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

It sounds to me like 10-20% of smokers will develop lung cancer. They represent 90% of the lung cancer cases. 10% of lung cancer cases are non-smokers. Better? It was a really weird way of saying it.


33 posted on 04/09/2010 9:38:55 PM PDT by TNdandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson