Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Justice Stevens now says he'll be gone in July.
fox

Posted on 04/09/2010 7:35:40 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55

Per Foxnews Alert


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnpaulstevens; seeya; supreme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: ConservativeMan55

He wants to be replaced before the new congress.


41 posted on 04/09/2010 7:51:15 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=taxes delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Ha! With all the Dems ‘retiring’ because they couldn’t get re-elected, I bet the WH has been inundated with hints. Can you imagine the uproar if he named Stupak!?!


42 posted on 04/09/2010 7:51:17 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Naw he likes her as Secretary of State.

She’s been out of the way. she wouldn’t take it.

She wants to take on Obama in 2012.


43 posted on 04/09/2010 7:51:17 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dead

Cass Sunstein?? LOL


44 posted on 04/09/2010 7:52:30 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
If it’s a younger piece of trash, then Barak’s ol’ buddy Arlen is going to be ticked. Some said he was promised a spot on the USSC for being a turncoat.

Arlen's a old dried up whore. He's lucky if he gets cab fare home.

45 posted on 04/09/2010 7:53:04 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

John Paul Stevens was placed on the SCOTUS by Gerald Ford. I remember Ford saying that he had read Steven’s briefs written while Stevens sat on a Federal Appealate Court and Ford emphasized that he concurred with Stevens’ written opinions. It was readily apparent that Steven’s was a leftist/liberal, and this misguided high court selection gave candidate Ronald Reagan more political traction against the bumbling Ford.

I don’t think anyone is surprised that Stevens would retire during the Obama administration. I always believed that Steven’s was more than a bit disingenous when he claimed that he was a “Conservative” on the Court. Moreover, I think that Stevens wanted to time this while Obama has a strong majority in the Senate, so Obama can get another “wise latina” type choice through this radical body. Perhaps Stevens’ believes that Obama would have to select a more “moderate” liberal if the GOP picked up another 8 or 9 seats in the next Senate elections.


46 posted on 04/09/2010 7:54:29 AM PDT by AdvisorB (Obamatude could be defined by Blago as something tangible, but not quite as tangible as JJJ's offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
By the way.. I see Barney Frank will not see reeelection.

I understand he's staying in D.C. though. He doesn't want to leave his boyfriend's behind.

47 posted on 04/09/2010 7:54:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

When people finally get deadly serious about removing the marxist tyrants, options will become available to remove even the marxist SC justices from their positions of power over the people of this nation. This will be done through either the need to fill a newly “vacated” seat or through the irrelevancy of the position in the context of certain states and the people of those states.


48 posted on 04/09/2010 7:54:46 AM PDT by myself6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Justice Stevens was Jerry Ford’s worst mistake; a truly stupid appointment made over the objections of conservatives by a go-along, get-along politician who had been in DC far too long.


49 posted on 04/09/2010 7:54:58 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

OH yes, just before the Nov elections we will get to point out the C/F/S drive by the Dummies.

Thanks Stevens. Free campaign material!


50 posted on 04/09/2010 7:55:31 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

We would be lucky to get Arlen.

First off he’s unpredictable, and would be guaranteed to produce a few accidental opinions we might like.

But the biggest reason is that he’s old.

And that’s probably why it’s a pipe dream.


51 posted on 04/09/2010 7:55:44 AM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
Oh and can you imagine the howls from the left if Obama nominates a former Republican Definitely not going to happen.
52 posted on 04/09/2010 7:56:35 AM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: myself6

Agreed.


53 posted on 04/09/2010 7:56:57 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: apillar

“If the Republicans had a lick of sense, they would filibuster the next Obama appointee and leave the seat unfilled until 2012, just like democrats did President Bush’s lower federal court nominees during his last two years in office.”

________________________________________________

You’re absolutely right. I hope they do it, but I doubt it.


54 posted on 04/09/2010 7:57:41 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: delapaz

Interesting..

I wonder what kind of backroom deals are going on
between Arlen, Obama.. Stevens.. and others.


55 posted on 04/09/2010 7:58:11 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

If you wanted to know if the Donks were going to lose the Senate in November, this indicates that the smart money thinks they will. Otherwise, why pick this fight before the election?


56 posted on 04/09/2010 8:07:10 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (Gov. Chris Christie (R) won the NJ-6 held by Rep. Frank Pallone (D) by a 15.5% margin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
Though I doubt the Republicans would have the cajones to filibuster a SC nominee.

I'm not optimistic either. Even Sotomayor, with all of her obviously biased, racist and incendiary public record, was backed by nine Republican Senators.

57 posted on 04/09/2010 8:14:41 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

bump


58 posted on 04/09/2010 8:14:50 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Ugh.

Notice all these “retirement” decisions are dumped on the American public on a Friday.

PR 101


59 posted on 04/09/2010 8:15:43 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze
I'm sad to see his retiring. It opens the door for someone worse, like Theresa McKinney. I doubt that his nominee will be Caucasian!

Any takers?

60 posted on 04/09/2010 8:19:43 AM PDT by Loud Mime (initialpoints.net - - The Constitution as the center of politics -- Download the graph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson