No. Even if he was born in Hawaii, his father's foreign citizenship prevents Zero from being natural-born.
“[I] find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen. ”
— John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, March 9, 1866 Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291, Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866).
-----
Congress-critters also tried to pass of this little gem for the benefit of O.
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1409, Children born out of wedlock
(c) Notwithstanding the provision of subsection (a) of this section, a person born, after December 23, 1952, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.
The only problem is that Zero was NOT born 'out of wedlock'.
Despite the fact his father was a bigamist, Zero's mother choose to get a divorce in a court of law instead of just having the marriage annulled, which keeps the illegitimate birth provision from applying to the Pretender in Chief.
How do you know he was NOT born out of wedlock? Have you ever seen the marriage or divorce certificate for his parents?