Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BearRepublic81; reaganaut

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17485112/The-Conclusive-Definition-of-Natural-Born-Citizen

http://thelibertypole.ning.com/forum/topics/the-definition-of-natural-born

http://volokh.com/posts/1204265246.shtml

With apologies to your ‘civics’ teachers and the modern lay dictionary, neither was a source at the time the Constitution was written.


353 posted on 04/08/2010 11:34:25 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker; BearRepublic81; mrreaganaut

Neither were blogs. Also the Constitution provides a ‘grandfather clause’ that no longer applies.

Legal precedence for starters...

Dred Scott v. Sandford,

Minor v. Happersett,

Perkins v. Elg

Schneider v. Rusk

United States v. Wong Kim Ark


359 posted on 04/08/2010 11:41:47 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson