[MrB]

Now, no need for an ad hominem,
my statement is exactly in line with
what the founders authorized the created
general government to do.

[Hank Kerchief]

“no need for an ad hominem”

Ad hominem has a very specific meaning. It is a logical fallacy meaning “to the man.” It is the attempt to repudiate an argument by referring to some aspect of a arguer’s character, history, nature, etc. Example: “His opinion about beer cannot be right because he’s from France and only drinks wine.”

I regard those who slavishly allow a government not even remotely like the one the founding fathers intended to rule them as sheep and slaves. It’s an opinion, not an argument.

Hank