Did you actually think before you posted that? Really?
I said on the same post you quote from that, “Saying you won't follow orders because you believe the CIC is not Constitutionally qualified to be president is no better than those who refused orders during the Bush administration because they believed the War on Terror was unconstitutional or against international law.” In what way can you disagree?
The tactic is bold. However, I believe it offers the other team too many opportunities to skirt the main issue. E.G., the Colonel can simply be relieved of duty, putting paid to the whole affair. Many other, much more drastic steps can be taken against him, long before any Court Martial convenes. If and when it does, (a long shot) I am reasonably certain a request to the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii for the documentation will NOT be made.I.E., the case will be contested on very limited, strictly military terms.
This Obama has thrown us into a Constitutional Crisis, which I personally believe can only be resolved after he leaves office at the end of his term. We have lived through a skillfully managed anti-constitutional Coup which has been temporarily successful.
It is like finding a known but undisclosed defect in a house, after title has passed; a defect which should have been discovered and reported by your real estate agent before closing. Due Diligence on Obama was not performed. We can recover. But not as quickly as one might wish. I know many a good real estate case that is older than a four-year Presidential term.