Skip to comments.
Cost estimate for F-35 to soar, Pentagon says
Star Telegram ^
| 3/07/2010
| Bob Cox
Posted on 04/07/2010 8:05:05 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: sonofstrangelove
Like any other government program, the initial cost estimates are simply to get something passed. Like ObamaCare and anything else, the price will spiral out of control.
2
posted on
04/07/2010 8:07:36 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(There is only a "Happily ever after" for you if you're the one writing your own script)
To: GeronL
Sticker shock might persuade buyers to purchase Super Hornets or F-15SGs
3
posted on
04/07/2010 8:08:38 PM PDT
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: Jet Jaguar
4
posted on
04/07/2010 8:09:06 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: sonofstrangelove
It’d almost be funny if it was so sad with all of the JSF fanboys here. The Joint Strike Failure.... less than a shadow of the F-22... will cost MORE than the F-22.
5
posted on
04/07/2010 8:09:43 PM PDT
by
DesScorp
To: GeronL
Besides a Change Order, I’ve never understood why costs suddenly change. You submit a bid and you’re bound by it unless the specs are changed.
Oh wait, that’s the real world and not the world of hidden government subsidies.
6
posted on
04/07/2010 8:10:40 PM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: DesScorp
$135 million dollars a plane. Its way too much. I would try to ressurect the F-22
7
posted on
04/07/2010 8:11:35 PM PDT
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
For the navy, bring back the design specs for the Sea Raptor. For now, use the superhornet and plasma stealth technology.
8
posted on
04/07/2010 8:14:01 PM PDT
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: mgstarr
Costs suddenly change because it was low-balled from the beginning in order to get Congress to pass it I suppose.
9
posted on
04/07/2010 8:16:02 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(There is only a "Happily ever after" for you if you're the one writing your own script)
To: sonofstrangelove
10
posted on
04/07/2010 8:16:17 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(There is only a "Happily ever after" for you if you're the one writing your own script)
To: DesScorp
11
posted on
04/07/2010 8:16:37 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(There is only a "Happily ever after" for you if you're the one writing your own script)
To: GeronL
In my “real” world, you’re bound by bids unless there’s a change order.
So much waste. So much fraud.
12
posted on
04/07/2010 8:19:59 PM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: sonofstrangelove
Slap a VAT on that sucker and let ‘er rip!
13
posted on
04/07/2010 8:21:27 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
("If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactical plan sucks." Allen West, Florida 22)
To: sonofstrangelove
The F-22 line closes in early 2011. It's not too late to keep it open, and order more F-22s at under $150 million each flyaway costs, but if the line is closed and later reopened, they will cost over $225 million apiece.
That is assuming that the USAF pays Lockheed to properly store the production tooling, rather than destroying it.
Rand Study on F-22 production alternatives.
14
posted on
04/07/2010 8:21:41 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: GeronL
has anything like this ever come in on budget? ever?
15
posted on
04/07/2010 8:22:04 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: Army Air Corps
To: sonofstrangelove
17
posted on
04/07/2010 9:15:39 PM PDT
by
Sequoyah101
(Half of the population is below average)
To: GeronL
Brilliant reporting...lots of what but no why and how.
18
posted on
04/07/2010 9:16:19 PM PDT
by
Sequoyah101
(Half of the population is below average)
To: Yo-Yo
Lockheed are the wrong contractor. They did good with unique and skunk works airplanes, great with the C-130, good with the C5 and the C-141 was ok but retired early for structural problems as I recall. We also spend a boat load rebuilding the C5 properly. The last fighter Lockheed built was the F-104.
Lockheed do not have a culture of production.
19
posted on
04/07/2010 9:19:29 PM PDT
by
Sequoyah101
(Half of the population is below average)
To: sonofstrangelove
And we cancelled the F22 because it cost how much?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson