MAny who are giving Palin a pass on this are the main reason we are in the fix we are now. They refuse to see what is right before their eyes.
Sarah said she and McCain have the same vsion for America and the direction we should take.
That sums it up for me. This is why I think her Discovery Channel show isn’t doing so well, people see she is a fruad.
You are delusional no doubt you prefer Ron Paul or the like.
Sarah Palin, unlike McCain, has been consistent not only in Alaska and as a candidate for VP but also since 2008. If you don’t like her fine but quit trying to put words in her mouth that she has not said. And by the way the Discovery Channel show hasn’t even been shot yet so go back to the gas oven and breathe a little more deeply. Perhaps then your brain will clear
True conservatism best for America
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2488434/posts
Written by a LEGAL immigrant.
[snip]America does have a problem with illegals, and Obama’s amnesty, or “path to citizenship,” would undermine the rule of law and make it harder for jobless Americans to compete with up to an estimated 20 million newly legalized illegal aliens.
It also is consistent for the GOP to oppose Mr. Obama’s amnesty as it was for many in the GOP to oppose former President George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain’s “path to citizenship.”
*****************.the Republican national platform calls for “enforcing the rule of law at the border and throughout the nation” and says, “We oppose amnesty. The rule of law suffers if government policies encourage or reward illegal activity.**************************
... true conservatives understand that amnesty corrupts our political system with an unspoken quid pro quo — politicians and their political parties pay for the votes of illegal aliens with amnesty. During the pro-amnesty rally in 2006, one sign said it all: “Today we march, tomorrow we vote,” If those illegal aliens vote for the same corrupt political system that they left behind, America can’t afford them.
Finally, conservatism must unite all four legs of this freedom chair — social, fiscal and national-security conservatives and the tea-party patriots — for the amnesty fight.
Social conservatives should worry that any undermining of the rule of law will destroy the moral foundation of this republic.
For fiscal conservatives, the rule of law guarantees our economic freedom. Without it, capitalism fails, which means big government’s further intrusions.
To national-security conservatives, enforcing the rule of law means border security, which is essential to our national security and sovereignty.
To tea-party patriots, undermining the rule of law destroys the Constitution’s underpinning.
I'm curious how a show that hasn't even aired yet is not doing well. Production is not even complete on it yet.
If you are talking about her "Real America" series on Fox News, it in fact did very well, comfortably outdrawing all of its competition.
Your conclusion might be more meaningful if you had any of your facts straight.
Since the Discovery Channel show hasn’t even been filmed yet, what do you base your allegations that it’s not doing well? Her “Real Americans” show on FOX News had the highest ratings of any show last Thursday in it’s time slot. She had more viewers than Greta (whose show was pre-empted) gets in the same time slot. The only primetime show that got more viewers than her was BOR.
“This is why I think her Discovery Channel show isn’t doing so well, people see she is a fruad.”
Reviewing the show before it has been filmed, edited and broadcast.....Hmmmmm....That’s a first.....