Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Medical Society Sues to Overturn ObamaCare
LifeSiteNews.com -- Your Life, Family, and Culture Outpost ^ | April 7, 2010

Posted on 04/07/2010 1:00:55 PM PDT by topher

Wednesday April 7, 2010


U.S. Medical Society Sues to Overturn ObamaCare

WASHINGTON, D.C., April 7, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) has filed a lawsuit against the newly enacted health care bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), making them the first U.S. medical society to take legal action against the sweeping health care overhaul.

The AAPS filed suit March 26 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

“If the PPACA goes unchallenged, then it spells the end of freedom in medicine as we know it,” said Jane Orient, M.D., the Executive Director of AAPS. “Courts should not allow this massive intrusion into the practice of medicine and the rights of patients.”

“There will be a dire shortage of physicians if the PPACA becomes effective and is not overturned by the courts.”

The PPACA requires most Americans to buy government-approved insurance starting in 2014, or face stiff penalties. Critics say that insurance company executives will be enriched by the requirement, and that it violates the Fifth Amendment protection against the government, forcing one person to pay cash to another.

AAPS also claims the PPACA violates the Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and Constitutional provisions authorizing taxation. It argues the Constitution’s Taxing and Spending power cannot be invoked since the premiums go to private insurance companies. Also, it says the traditional sovereignty of the States over the practice of medicine is destroyed by the PPACA.

AAPS notes that in scoring the proposal the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) was bound by assumptions imposed by Congress, including the ability to “save” $500 billion in Medicare, and to redirect $50 billion from Social Security. HHS Secretary Sebelius stated that PPACA would reduce the federal deficit.

The medical association says it is asking the Court to stop the federal government from promulgating or enforcing insurance mandates and to require HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue to provide the Court with an accounting of Medicare and Social Security solvency.

According to AAPS Congress recognized that PPACA cannot be funded without the mandate for every American to have health insurance, and will become unenforceable without them.

Legal action is necessary “to preserve individual liberty” and “to prevent PPACA from bankrupting the United States generally and Medicare and Social Security specifically,” AAPS stated.

The AAPS complaint and more information about the suit are posted here.

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/apr/10040702.html


Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.



TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; aaps; healthcare; obamacare
Will the AMA join in?
1 posted on 04/07/2010 1:00:56 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher

It’s political, it’s all just political. Isn’t that what the HHS secretary said?


2 posted on 04/07/2010 1:03:05 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

>Will the AMA join in?
*

You mean, the AMA which whored themselves to Obama, patting themselves on the back, claiming they were the de facto medical org which “represents” every doctor in America when only they have 17% registered doctors on their membership roll?

lemme think about that..


3 posted on 04/07/2010 1:05:22 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Heck, no, the AMA won’t join. Most docs don’t belong to the AMA, anyway. Why doesn’t anyone fight in the courts with the argument that it hinders free enterprise?


4 posted on 04/07/2010 1:07:44 PM PDT by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

They will probably be counter-sued for trying to deny people their “right to health care.” Uninsured is the new black. Entitlement is the new word for liberty.


5 posted on 04/07/2010 1:10:40 PM PDT by TigersEye (Duncan Hunter, Jim DeMint, Michelle Bachman, ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
and to require HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue to provide the Court with an accounting of Medicare and Social Security solvency

And make the bastards use GAAP.

6 posted on 04/07/2010 1:15:46 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

bttt


7 posted on 04/07/2010 1:26:57 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

I would love to see more MD’s quietly join and then stage a coup!


8 posted on 04/07/2010 1:42:15 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: topher

Are you kidding? They’re out having lunch with the bankers, insurance companies, big pharma, and General Motors.


9 posted on 04/07/2010 1:43:33 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


10 posted on 04/07/2010 2:04:51 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb
Why doesn’t anyone fight in the courts with the argument that it hinders free enterprise?

I don't know. That would make it a Ninth Amendment argument, which is just as valid as the others outlined in the column. In addition, our founders wrote that we have an inalienable right to pursue happiness, ie the right to make an honest living, which will be curtailed under National Socialized Healthcare.

11 posted on 04/07/2010 2:30:37 PM PDT by Jacquerie (More Central Planning is not the solution to problems caused by Central Planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson