>> Otherwise, you venture pretty close to liberal territory, accusing the other students of a “thought crime” because of an outcome you seem to disagree with.
Thought crime? I didn’t object to thoughts ... I objected to the outcome directly and explicitly.
SnakeDoc
No, you objected to the outcome because you believe it represents the "ostracization" of the students that attended the "official" party - without any evidence that the other students failed to invite the others. So you are imputing certain thoughts and motives to the students hosting the private party - that they refused to invite these 7 students, and did so because they are "outcasts". Your outrage is based on your interpretation of the intent of the majority of the students, and hence, constitutes a "thought crime" mentality.