No, you objected to the outcome because you believe it represents the "ostracization" of the students that attended the "official" party - without any evidence that the other students failed to invite the others. So you are imputing certain thoughts and motives to the students hosting the private party - that they refused to invite these 7 students, and did so because they are "outcasts". Your outrage is based on your interpretation of the intent of the majority of the students, and hence, constitutes a "thought crime" mentality.
My outrage is based on the fact that at least one, if not seven, individuals were sent to the wrong location rather than being told about the real location of the actual prom/party.
I don’t care what they were thinking.
SnakeDoc