Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamalateral Disarmament
Investors.com ^ | April 6, 2010 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY Staff

Posted on 04/06/2010 4:51:42 PM PDT by Kaslin

National Security: Aiming at a world where nuclear weapons are obsolete, the administration's nuclear posture review leaves a world without American nuclear weapons and the backbone to use them.

After his stunning bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, Japanese Adm. Isoroku Yamamoto lamented that all that had been accomplished was to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.

Under policies announced by the Obama administration, a devastating chemical or biological attack on this country might merely awaken our very own Hamlet and fill him with a terrible sense of angst.

We have said before that rather than strive for a world without nuclear weapons, we should strive for a world without enemies willing to use them against us. Our retaliatory power should be unquestioned, as should be our willingness to use it. President Reagan called this proven and successful policy peace through strength. It has been replaced by a hair-splitting policy of nuance.

The U.S. is now promising not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attack America with biological or chemical weapons or launch a paralyzing cyberattack.

This is good news for our enemies to know — they can wipe out much of New York City, but as long as their signature is on that piece of paper, their capital is safe from becoming a pile of irradiated rubble. We are not making this up.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: abjectsurrender; agenda; appeasement; armscontrol; barackhusseinobama; bho44; bhodefense; bhonukes; biologicalweapons; chemicalweapons; ctbt; cyberattack; cyberwarfare; defense; defenseless; deterrent; disarmament; disarmanent; djsob; donttreadonme; givemeliberty; ibd; livefreeordie; military; nationaldefense; nationalsecurity; nonproliferation; npt; nucleardeterrent; nucleardisarmament; nuclearpolicy; nucleartesting; nuclearwarheads; nuclearweapons; obama; obamalateral; obamasamerica; pearlharbor; policyshift; reagan; ronaldreagan; ronaldwilsonreagan; russia; surrender; surrendercrats; testban; testbantreaty; warheads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: FBD
If he puts us into a war, it doesn’t mean *he* loses... we do as a country, granted... but all sorts of civil rights get taken away, under martial law... and he might just retain his power.

Even if he gets himself killed, he still dies in the knowledge he has the eternal adulation of the barbarians for fatally weakening the Great Satan.

41 posted on 04/07/2010 5:49:41 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
There is no doubt in my mind this man is a Muslim, at this point. NONE. I agree, he is an extreme danger to our republic... and:
I think his Regime is setting us up for a false flag operation...similar to Reichstag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c7Wi8ILGcM&NR=1

42 posted on 04/07/2010 8:18:05 AM PDT by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring; Black Bart

>”If I also recall corrrectly, we’ve never had a President McGovern.”<

-exactly... but we *DO* have a pResident 0bama.
So...what does he stand to gain by this? Martial law, after we are attacked? A delayed election?
-I put NOTHING past this Regime.


43 posted on 04/07/2010 8:19:18 AM PDT by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Landru; muawiyah
PING

>”I can only conclude Obama wants war!”<
- I concur

44 posted on 04/07/2010 8:21:31 AM PDT by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FBD
So...what does he stand to gain by this? Martial law, after we are attacked? A delayed election?

All the above if he lives.

If he dies in the attack, "72 virgins", and eternal fame among the Barbarians as "The Won who destroyed The Great Satan".

45 posted on 04/07/2010 8:35:08 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FBD
"I think his Regime is setting us up for a false flag operation...similar to Reichstag."

I have stated similar thoughts here myself. No matter what you can't trust Obama.

46 posted on 04/07/2010 6:09:27 PM PDT by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson