Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: kosciusko51
You beat me by 3 seconds!
2 posted on
04/06/2010 8:00:07 AM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
To: kosciusko51
This is good...but the fiends won’t stop.
3 posted on
04/06/2010 8:03:13 AM PDT by
eleni121
(For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
To: kosciusko51
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court has ruled that the Federal Communications Commission lacks the authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment to all Internet traffic flowing over their networks.
Tuesday's ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is a big victory for Comcast Corp., the nation's largest cable company. It had challenged the FCC's authority to impose so called "net neutrality" obligations.
It marks a serious setback for the FCC, which needs authority to regulate the Internet in order to push ahead with key parts of its massive national broadband plan.
This is a setback I can believe in.
4 posted on
04/06/2010 8:04:28 AM PDT by
Danae
( The sleeping Giant is awake)
To: kosciusko51
Good. But the fascist liberals will see that this is undone but pronto.
10 posted on
04/06/2010 8:11:25 AM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: kosciusko51
Any time the FCC is limited, it is good. THE FCC IS FOR BROADCASTING, not intertubing.
11 posted on
04/06/2010 8:13:37 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
14 posted on
04/06/2010 8:16:03 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: kosciusko51
Oh thank god. A ray of sanity in a dark age.
18 posted on
04/06/2010 8:26:44 AM PDT by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: kosciusko51
20 posted on
04/06/2010 8:28:42 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(Capitalism = billions raised from poverty, Socialism = billions reduced to starvation)
To: kosciusko51
Well, that’s heartening! Woohoo!
24 posted on
04/06/2010 8:34:54 AM PDT by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
To: kosciusko51
I’d be happier if the decision, which is concise and available at http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/comcastfcc.pdf, bothered to the Constitution. Instead, it merely notes that Congress has not given the FCC the necessary authority. So Congress can grant the authority needed, according to this decision. That should be no problem for this crowd.
IMHO the court should have stated that the FCC has no authorization UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, which grants the central government zero authority to regulate who does what on a private network.
27 posted on
04/06/2010 8:53:07 AM PDT by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
28 posted on
04/06/2010 8:53:51 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: kosciusko51
Can I start a pirate FM station now?
31 posted on
04/06/2010 9:00:27 AM PDT by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: kosciusko51
42 posted on
04/06/2010 9:24:15 AM PDT by
broken_arrow1
(I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
To: kosciusko51
46 posted on
04/06/2010 9:40:32 AM PDT by
cranked
To: kosciusko51
54 posted on
04/06/2010 10:35:53 AM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
56 posted on
04/06/2010 10:49:17 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
To: kosciusko51
Because the FCC "has failed to tie its assertion" of regulatory authority to any actual law enacted by Congress, the agency does not have the authority to regulate an Internet provider's network management practices, wrote Judge David Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.Somebody reading the constitution?
61 posted on
04/06/2010 11:06:59 AM PDT by
GVnana
To: kosciusko51
Just the beginning of many judicial smack downs to come for Zero!
To: kosciusko51
65 posted on
04/06/2010 11:33:45 AM PDT by
Snerdley
(You can put a Suit on a Community Organizer, but it's still an EMPTY SUIT!)
To: kosciusko51
Drudge's headline and image on this are priceless!
COURT: NO INTERNET CONTROL FOR
FCC; BLOW TO JULIUS, REGULATION,
RULES
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson