Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/06/2010 7:59:12 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: kosciusko51

You beat me by 3 seconds!


2 posted on 04/06/2010 8:00:07 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

This is good...but the fiends won’t stop.


3 posted on 04/06/2010 8:03:13 AM PDT by eleni121 (For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court has ruled that the Federal Communications Commission lacks the authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment to all Internet traffic flowing over their networks.

Tuesday's ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is a big victory for Comcast Corp., the nation's largest cable company. It had challenged the FCC's authority to impose so called "net neutrality" obligations.

It marks a serious setback for the FCC, which needs authority to regulate the Internet in order to push ahead with key parts of its massive national broadband plan.


This is a setback I can believe in.
4 posted on 04/06/2010 8:04:28 AM PDT by Danae ( The sleeping Giant is awake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
Good. But the fascist liberals will see that this is undone but pronto.

Redistribution is Theft, x-small
10 posted on 04/06/2010 8:11:25 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Any time the FCC is limited, it is good. THE FCC IS FOR BROADCASTING, not intertubing.


11 posted on 04/06/2010 8:13:37 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

14 posted on 04/06/2010 8:16:03 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Oh thank god. A ray of sanity in a dark age.


18 posted on 04/06/2010 8:26:44 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Slap down the EPA next!


20 posted on 04/06/2010 8:28:42 AM PDT by listenhillary (Capitalism = billions raised from poverty, Socialism = billions reduced to starvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Well, that’s heartening! Woohoo!


24 posted on 04/06/2010 8:34:54 AM PDT by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

I’d be happier if the decision, which is concise and available at http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/comcastfcc.pdf, bothered to the Constitution. Instead, it merely notes that Congress has not given the FCC the necessary authority. So Congress can grant the authority needed, according to this decision. That should be no problem for this crowd.

IMHO the court should have stated that the FCC has no authorization UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, which grants the central government zero authority to regulate who does what on a private network.


27 posted on 04/06/2010 8:53:07 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here
28 posted on 04/06/2010 8:53:51 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Can I start a pirate FM station now?


31 posted on 04/06/2010 9:00:27 AM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Ping


42 posted on 04/06/2010 9:24:15 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Good news. *thumbsup*


46 posted on 04/06/2010 9:40:32 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast

The decision is a setback for lawmakers who are trying to legislate net neutrality, also with the assumption that the FCC has the authority to codify such rules. Lawmakers including Sens. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) have been big backers of net neutrality. In the House, Reps. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.) have repeatedly pushed for formal net neutrality rules.


54 posted on 04/06/2010 10:35:53 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...

ping


56 posted on 04/06/2010 10:49:17 AM PDT by nutmeg (Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
Because the FCC "has failed to tie its assertion" of regulatory authority to any actual law enacted by Congress, the agency does not have the authority to regulate an Internet provider's network management practices, wrote Judge David Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Somebody reading the constitution?

61 posted on 04/06/2010 11:06:59 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Just the beginning of many judicial smack downs to come for Zero!


62 posted on 04/06/2010 11:12:24 AM PDT by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51

Yay!


65 posted on 04/06/2010 11:33:45 AM PDT by Snerdley (You can put a Suit on a Community Organizer, but it's still an EMPTY SUIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
Drudge's headline and image on this are priceless!

COURT: NO INTERNET CONTROL FOR

FCC; BLOW TO JULIUS, REGULATION,

RULES

67 posted on 04/06/2010 11:51:57 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson