Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

“should they be required to fight, antagonize one another, risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences or should they be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways?”

Oh, the left will be in serious trouble if it comes down to a fight.

The liberals have some union muscle and a lot of ghetto dwellers to throw into the battle, but that is about it. They’d be in serious trouble if regular, suburban/rural, patriotic, gun owning American’s ever really decided to fight.

Well, I guess the socialists have aging hipsters, homosexuals, and college radicals in reserve, but they would likely surrender to even a few troops of cub scouts (whom the left no doubt view as the modern Hitler Youth).

No, the liberals better hope it never comes down to a real fight. They would lose and lose really, really fast.


24 posted on 04/05/2010 5:31:18 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Longbow1969
We don't even have to face off with them, all we have to do is cut the power or water (whose sources are likely located in the rural red areas) to their cities and they will riot and turn on each other and burn down their own neighborhoods.

Actually, once inflation kicks in and their checks become worthless and/or bounce they will do that regardless of what we do

185 posted on 04/06/2010 11:19:44 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson