Like I said earlier, let's not argue fringe cases, but pick the low hanging fruit, so to speak.
Pro-aborts try to confuse the issue with these fringe cases, which amount for 1% of the abortions,
whereas they don't want to talk about the 99% of abortions done out of convenience for the "mother".
Well that's what everyone was arguing. Eagle Eye simply pointed out that from a strictly biblical standpoint, "life" does not exist until there is "blood". He made a valid point (IMHO) and people were treating him as if he were promoting partial birth abortion.