Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter Hopes Justice Stevens Doesn't Quit in 2010
6abc ^ | Sunday, April 04, 2010

Posted on 04/04/2010 5:15:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway

A leading Democratic senator hopes Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens doesn't decide to retire this year.

The 89-year-old Stevens says he "will surely" step down during Barack Obama's presidency, and will decide soon whether it's this year or next.

Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., worries that a nomination fight this year would mean gridlock in the partisan Senate. Specter thinks there's a better chance for consensus next year.

Specter tells "Fox News Sunday" he hopes Obama would pick someone who would be a check on executive power, as he says Stevens has provided.

Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, the second-ranking Republican in the Senate, isn't ruling out a possible GOP filibuster.

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhoscotus; johnpaulstevens; specter; stevens; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2010 5:15:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I would be nice to have a vacant liberal seat when the health care ltitgation gets to SCOTUS.


2 posted on 04/04/2010 5:19:52 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Specter thinks there's a better chance for consensus next year.

Sphincter is out of his mind.

3 posted on 04/04/2010 5:21:37 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Arlen Sphincter used to be somebody. Now he is a traitorous hack...and the sooner Toomey takes his place, the better.

If we can keep voter fraud down in the Philadelphia precinct to 102% turnout, we might have a chance.


4 posted on 04/04/2010 5:22:32 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

there isn’t some sort of backdoor SCOTUS process similar to reconciliation that lets them affirm a law with two votes, is there?

(relax. I am kidding)


5 posted on 04/04/2010 5:22:39 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Ya don’t even need two votes, just a proclamation by his spiffyness.


6 posted on 04/04/2010 5:24:01 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sphinkter is term limitted himself.


7 posted on 04/04/2010 5:27:45 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’m trying to figure out why anyone gives a dump what that old fool thinks anyway.


8 posted on 04/04/2010 5:27:47 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (You don't have to be ignorant to be a Democrat...but if you are...so what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Ya don’t even need two votes, just a proclamation by his spiffyness.

that's right. that little known constitutional provision whereby the president may decree whatever he wants; "The Presidential Decree of Sheer Awesomeness".

9 posted on 04/04/2010 5:27:52 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Specter Hopes Justice Stevens Doesn't Quit in 2010

One of the few times I agree with Specter. Let Stevens quit in 2012, so we can hold up 0bama’s invariably hard left replacement's nomination right through to 2013, when a conservative president can nominate a proper conservative, constitutionalist judge to the SCOTUS.

10 posted on 04/04/2010 5:31:19 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

No kidding. Is there anyone in the Senate whose opinion I would care about less?

He’s like the 50-year-old debutant who still thinks she turns heads.


11 posted on 04/04/2010 5:31:32 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for, it matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Who could possibly care what Sphincter has to say about this or anything other than his impending retirement?


12 posted on 04/04/2010 5:52:52 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
“He’s like the 50-year-old debutant who still thinks she turns heads.”

See Raquel Welch on TV this week?.....69 years old and YOWSA!

13 posted on 04/04/2010 5:58:26 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

Oh yes and admitted to being conservative!


14 posted on 04/04/2010 5:59:22 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anton

Just tell Obama none of his appointees are mainstream enough (Old dem tatic) and stall until we have a Rep. President.


15 posted on 04/04/2010 6:00:41 PM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

A quorum on SCOTUS is 6. As I recall, a 4-4 vote (or even 3-3) ruling upholds the lower court’s decision but no precedent is set.


16 posted on 04/04/2010 6:25:37 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Specter tells “Fox News Sunday” he hopes Obama would pick someone who would be a check on executive power”

For who’s benefit was this FREAKING LIE??


17 posted on 04/04/2010 7:25:53 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It is vital to the future of the Republic that we win back the Senate in 2010.


18 posted on 04/04/2010 7:33:24 PM PDT by cmj328 (Got ruthless?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Arlen Sphincter used to be somebody.

Yeah, somebody who got bail for the murderer who kept his girlfriend's body in a closet. Remember the Einhorn case? That should have wrecked Specter's career right there. I don't know what's wrong with Pennsylvania.

19 posted on 04/04/2010 8:26:27 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

I wouldn’t be surprised if this resulted in the first recess appointment to the Supreme Court since Eisenhower appointed Brennan.

It could conceivably even be the first recess appointment not to be subsequently confirmed by the Senate since John Rutledge, who was appointed by Washington.


20 posted on 04/04/2010 10:00:17 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson