Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seeing red
Townhall.com ^ | April 4, 2010 | Paul Jacob

Posted on 04/04/2010 9:30:00 AM PDT by Kaslin

This year Social Security will hit its budget crisis, seven years ahead of schedule. In 2010, the wizards in Washington will have to pay out more to beneficiaries than we’re paying in via our payroll taxes.

During the Bush years, in the wake of proposals to set up private, individual retirement accounts — and not run Social Security as a huge Ponzi scheme — politicians seemed to stand together on one foothold of common ground: 2017 (the prophesied year of redness) was a long way off.

Critics of the administration’s proposal did more than suggest that Bush was out to ruin Social Security. But, ahem, now the crisis is here.

Politicians did think they had some time. The first year of running into the red was thought, then, to be more than a decade away.

Decades just aren’t what they used to be.

It’s obvious to those with common sense (may I say, especially to readers of my Common Sense e-letter?) that timing is important. Hit the brakes before impacting the wall. You prevent disasters, don’t wait for them to happen, and then “heroically” step in.

Enter stage Left: Democrats’ support for their just enacted and signed-into-law medical reform package.

Wise counsel would have them fix existing entitlement programs before inventing new ones. But to excite their base for this year’s congressional elections, the Democrats fiscal fix was to apply for a new credit card, max it out on new spending, and let older debt lurch closer to default.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: democrats; economy; socialsecurity
Looks like President Bush was right
1 posted on 04/04/2010 9:30:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Guess that’s it then!! Baby boomers being at the bottom of the ss pyramid scheme will get zero!!! 50 years of paying in to this scam and nothing to show for it. The system is going to crash and sooner that most expected


2 posted on 04/04/2010 9:40:50 AM PDT by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To the Editor:

For quite a number of years we have heard that Social Security is going to be broke by this date or that date. The last so-called fix was in the 1980’s, a fix that was supposed to keep S.S. system solvent for all time. But, why is S.S now in danger, again?

The ‘Great Recession’ and high unemployment not with standing, the problem with S.S. really began in the 1960’s when Lynden Johnson was President. The ‘Independent Trust Fund’ had a large reservoir of money trapped within it. The combination of a Democrat President and a Democrat controlled Congress coupled with the long, pent-up willingness to tap into that wad of money gave the impetus for taking it out of the ‘Independent Trust Fund’ and rolling it into the ‘General Fund’.

Within a short time that money was spent. But, each year S.S. generated billions in surpluses that went into the ‘General Fund’. Congress spent that as well. But they had the Treasury Department issue special bonds (I.O.U.s), which now total $2.5 trillion. Is it possible these bonds might be worth the paper on which they are written?

Then, President Clinton, with Al Gore’s tie-breaking vote in the Senate, signed a law that now makes 85% of ones S.S. benefits subject to income tax. Wonderful!

Folks, our Country is bankrupt. Dare we admit that? Do any of you believe that Congress will pay back that $2.5 trillion, let alone put us on the path to fiduciary solvency?

Donald Parmentier
Yakima, WA


3 posted on 04/04/2010 9:52:11 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timetostand

The plan is to pay them with Confederate Money.


4 posted on 04/04/2010 9:58:45 AM PDT by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste," Rahm Emanuel

They are planning the next crisis and want to move up the timeline.

5 posted on 04/04/2010 10:12:39 AM PDT by eggman (Grab a mop Mr. Gibbs! Your boss is making another mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The faster this system collapses the better.

And I mean the entire monetary system.

The only way to make the recipient class understand who pays their bills is to starve the livin hell out of them.


6 posted on 04/04/2010 10:16:22 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

Let me correct you:

The ‘Great Recession’ and high unemployment not with standing, the problem with S.S. really began in 1935 when Franklin Roosevelt was President.

Its another government program, like so many created around that time and since, that never should have been started in the first place :/ LBJ just took a bad idea and made it over 10 times worse


7 posted on 04/04/2010 10:24:44 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: central_va

>The plan is to pay them with Confederate Money.

Ouch!
But then again, it may be just a little while until Confed money is worth more than the USD, especially with all the policies Government is pushing.


8 posted on 04/04/2010 10:38:23 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: timetostand
The system is going to crash and sooner that most expected

Obie will take over all pension plans (except the unions) for the common good and "redistribute the wealth."

9 posted on 04/04/2010 11:11:59 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is <strike>fading</strike>gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
But then again, it may be just a little while until Confed money is worth more than the USD, especially with all the policies Government is pushing.

It is already worth a lot more... Confederate $5.00 bill.

Current price? $20.49

.

10 posted on 04/04/2010 12:01:20 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TLI

That’s only 0.98% annual interest compounded over 145 years. That didn’t even keep up with inflation.

On the other hand, perhaps $20.49 - current - depreciated for inflation over 145 years is on par with Confederate $5 purchasing power (then). Dunno.


11 posted on 04/04/2010 12:45:03 PM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar
Yes, but the money was rolled out of the independent trust fund and into the general fund so it could be skimmed off by Congress to make their reckless spending look not so reckless.

If the trust fund had been left in place then SS would not have a bunch of worthless IOU's in a file in place of the $2.5 trillion that has literally been stolen.

This is not unlike the unfunded pension funds that some of the unions have absconded with.

12 posted on 04/06/2010 4:30:18 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson