Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Nothing can be done. People--not only libs and RINOs but self-identified conservatives--never want to give back once they've had cent one taken from them.

Don't believe me?

How many people here on FR would forfeit all they've paid in the system if Obamacare, Social Security, and any other government program we criticize were ended today?

6 posted on 04/02/2010 11:44:16 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Conservative Bostonian, atheist pro-lifer, soon be gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377

The best card we have is that central planning doesn’t work. Natural law trumps big government.


9 posted on 04/02/2010 11:52:33 PM PDT by Cheap_Hessian (I am the Grim FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

Darkwolf377: “How many people here on FR would forfeit all they’ve paid in the system if Obamacare, Social Security, and any other government program we criticize were ended today?”

I haven’t paid anything into Obamacare, yet. That’s easy to forfeit. As for Social Security and Medicare, I’d definitely decline to participate (even at my age) if they’d return my contributions dollar for dollar.

Conservative candidates should give serious thought to Social Security and Medicare. These are popular programs with millions of people dependent on them. Yet, they open the door to wealth redistribution. If, for example, SS is constitutional, than pretty much ANY form of wealth redistribution is constitutional.

Some people are infuriated about Obamacare’s individual mandate. Even though the individual mandate may not stand up in court, keep in mind the federal government could have easily increased taxes to whatever amount it wanted and regulated all private insurance companies out of existence. The 16th Amendment and a warped Commerce Clause are all they needed!

I think conservatives should oppose all forms of wealth redistribution, but we should also be pragmatic. In the short term, that means trying to fix SS and Medicare to be self-sustaining. In the long term, it means giving people the option to opt out with private retirement plans.

It took us 80 years to get here. It’s not going to be changed back over night.


11 posted on 04/03/2010 12:27:24 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Governor Palin backs RINO extraordinaire Juan McPain (and that just sucks!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

I’d happily do it. I’ve paid in more than most. I figure it is all lost anyway. If I could stop the bleeding I’d take it and build a new future.


15 posted on 04/03/2010 2:52:19 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

I hear you, but it really ain’t a question of “will they give it up?” How can they (we) get the money when there ain’t any? That is the question. The answer is easy. We won’t.


19 posted on 04/03/2010 4:20:32 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

Me.


23 posted on 04/03/2010 4:40:41 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377
People--not only libs and RINOs but self-identified conservatives--never want to give back once they've had cent one taken from them.

Nonsense. Greece, Russia.. there are plenty of examples of "giving back" when the spit hits the fan. We're still in the borrowing from the future phase but that cant last for ever.

24 posted on 04/03/2010 4:45:23 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson