On law, ODH has been correct on pretty much every occasion as to how US law would work in regards to eligibility lawsuits.
On the alleged “facts” surrounding BHO, so many do not hold up under scrutiny.
The multiple SSN’s “fact” is unsupported.
The “fact” of a forged COLB is poorly supported at best.
The list goes on to cover the numerous “facts” that have come and go and come back again such as allegations that his grandmother said he was born in Kenya, his sister had a COLB stating place of birth in Hawaii, Pakistan being closed to Americans in 1981, BHO claiming Kenyan birth in a debate with Keyes, etc... None of it holds water.
Consider:
Earlier you made comparisons to the events of 9/11. Well, do you believe terrorists flew planes into the WTC and that’s why the towers fell?
Well, there are hundreds of websites and blogs run by folks who have convinced themselves otherwise. If you disagree with them, they will tell you that you are ignoring the “facts”.
They construct emotionally pleasing litanies for themselves about how the system is broken. How the government and the media are corrupted and conspiring to cover up the crimes of the Bushies/Israelis/NWO/Bilderbergers/CFR/Venutians and that they and they alone have figured out the truth. That the thousands of people who study this kind of thing for a living do not agree with them only proves how deep the conspiracy goes and how blind everyone else is.
Give it time and watch this issue. You’ll see it continue to go nowhere because there is nowhere for it to go.
I’m just curious why you put forth so much effort trying to counter an issue that you think is going nowhere??
I’m talking about the facts I’ve presented on my blog. Janice Okubo said that certificate numbers were given by the state registrar on the “Date filed”. That is a fact. If what she said is correct, there is no way that the Factcheck COLB’s combination of “Date filed” and certificate number are compatible with the Nordyke certificates.
So how do you explain that?
I’ve listed a bunch of facts, with links to the documentation. Which of those facts are you contesting?
It is more like that he has figured out like everyone else that getting the judiciary or any other controlling authority to look at Obama's sordid past history where the odds at the moment are against; however, not for the reasons that you think or express, but it it still a worthy effort to expose Obama that you know he is hiding.