Apparently you didn’t read when I’ve said it here the 10 or so times before: The best Hawaii has for Obama is an amended birth certificate, which according to Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 does not qualify as prima facie evidence.
Anything the HDOH prints for Obama has to note the amendment. Specifically that Obama amended the medical information portion of his BC 45 years after the birth. The fact that what Obama posted doesn’t note the amendment proves that it is a forgery.
So Obama has no prima facie evidence from Hawaii and posted a forgery rather than show what he actually DOES have in Hawaii.
Those are facts. Read the blog. http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
The template the forgers used explains pretty well that it only has prima facie value if presented in a court of law. It doesn’t say it has prima facie value if posted as a jpg on a campaign Web site and it certainly doesn’t say it has prima facie value if photographed by bumbling, amateur, self-appointed fact checkers. There’s a reason why it hasn’t been presented in court and why the issuing agency won’t affirm its authenticity.