Tell me where I’m wrong. Tell me why Obama amending the medical portion of his birth certificate 45 years after the event is no big deal. Tell me why he and his mom didn’t simply have a doctor examine them within 30 days of the birth and complete the BC so there wouldn’t be these problems today.
Tell me why the DOH confirmed in 2 different ways that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery. And then tell me why Obama posted a forgery and tried to pass it off as genuine.
With all your law degrees and stellar academic record I’m sure it should be a piece of cake to hit those questions out of the ball park. Hit me with your best shot, champ.
Do you understand the definitions of "supposition" and "conjecture"?
I quoted this earlier, but it bears repeating...From Judge Land's opinion in his decision granting the defendant's MTD...
""A spurious claim questioning the Presidents constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Courts placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest."
You don't cite a single fact, not one. All you post is speculation and suspicion. The fact that you don't understand the difference between supposition and fact, speaks volumes. It also speaks volumes about why birthers have yet to prevail in a single case.