Of course that's what it means. /s
I'm sure your "blog" has much more to offer them than their respective three years of law school (both from top 20 programs), and 20+ years (each) of practical legal experience, including Levin's own experience at the Department of Justice.
To anyone who's functionally literate, and who not certifiably crazy, there is no conspiracy because there's nothing to be conspiratorial about.
That’s a good list of insults and strawmen, but nothing that actually discounts nor disputes the validity of what B has posted at her blog.
Law degrees don’t equal factual knowlege about a contemporary situation. I’m talking basic comprehension of the factual information.
You seem so afraid that the answer is going to come up “conspiracy”. Like I said to Drew, do the math. If you’re faithful in each step along the way, then whatever the end comes out to is just reality. You didn’t make it the reality and you’re not crazy for recognizing it as reality.
It’s the basic epistemology of science. You observe, you test, and you let the facts take you wherever they lead. If you have a preconceived notion of what answer is no way, no how acceptable, I guarantee that you will never come up with that answer - even if all the steps taken one at a time lead you there.