Posted on 04/01/2010 7:27:57 AM PDT by reaganaut1
I showed you how silly it is to call your attempt, a “comparison”, there is absolutely no comparison. There never was a “death weight” around Reagan’s neck, that shows incredible ignorance, for one thing Reagan had already started earning his national recognition as a conservative while he was head of the actor’s guild in 1947, with his congressional testimony and anticommunist stand that caused him to have to start carrying a gun, that recognition grew as he became a celebrity endorser of Republican Presidential candidates throughout the 1950s, I guess you forgot his 1964 convention speech for Barry Goldwater. Reagan was known as a red blooded, right winger during the 1960s and 1970s, Romney is known as a weak liberal with no convictions, even since he started trying to advertise the opposite image in 2006.
Your efforts to promote Mitt Romney get ever lamer, and you never even try to respond to the Romney facts.
“The fact that Romney deliberately left the Republican party because of Reagan and was against the 1994 Republican revolution and was fund raising for Democrats just before he re registered as Republican in 1993, and then was proven to have still been doing fund raising for abortions and Planned Parenthood in 1994, and his continued leftist political activism and causes for more than a decade after that, in fact all the way until he switched to running for the 2008 Republican primary, is a whole different story.”
Like I said, your head spin like Linda Blairs, and since you can’t read while your head is spinning you don’t realize your arguing with a strawman of your own making.
Guess you missed the Paul Ryan part of the discussion, huh?
What you won’t do is respond directly to the exposing of Mitt Romney.
I directly refuted your post 11 and your only answer is personal insults and avoiding acknowledging the destruction of your lame attempt at “comparison” for that which there is no comparison.
If you are going to attempt to promote Mitt Romney then you have to respond to the facts about him.
People said the same thing about McCain after the immigration debacle.
That’s funny.
LOL HG
Doesn't look like Kennedy.. or Limbaugh or Scott Brown...
Wait, it'll come to me, I've seen him before...
#49 for your amusement.
Romney needed to admit the error of this bill to have a chance in his party.
Mitt admiring his special self ping!
Oh, SNAP!
Now you've gone and started another FReepathon.
Well done, nice work.
To 45 - LOL
The irony of your post is pretty hilarious.
No, you just proved it correct again by still being unable to respond.
“What you won’t do is respond directly to the exposing of Mitt Romney.
I directly refuted your post 11 and your only answer is personal insults and avoiding acknowledging the destruction of your lame attempt at “comparison” for that which there is no comparison.
If you are going to attempt to promote Mitt Romney then you have to respond to the facts about him.”
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Nobody else seems to agree, or have an interest in your personal jihad here. You are just wasting the hosts bandwidth at this point. You should stop, but as a long time member of various forums, I know you won’t.
You might take a hint from the fact the host, and the mods, ignored your none to subtle hints previously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.