Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dick Holmes

This seems reasonable AS LONG AS: Motorcyclists ALONE accept ALL FINANCIAL LIABILITY for any accidents resulting from a collision that occurs because a lane splitting motocyclist flies out of nowhere into a motorist who has the misfortune of trying to change lanes when the lane-splitter shoots through.


47 posted on 03/31/2010 8:19:09 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Give them 2.54 cm and they'll take 1.61 km.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCmember
There is no reason to split lanes, when there is an open lane next to a vehicle.

Most splitting takes place between two cars adjacent to each other.

Your thesis fails. Lane splitters won't often be hit by cars changing lanes (for they can't change lanes, when there is another car next to them), or else it wouldn't be called splitting.(!)

I've only split lanes myself, when traffic came to a crawl, then I would only pass carefully at about 5-10 mph more than the stalled or slow traffic.

Let the rider decide. Then, if the cop says, "hey buddy, too fast, unsafe" the rider can sign, then pay the ticket. If he ain't dead.

78 posted on 03/31/2010 9:05:18 AM PDT by BlueDragon (there is no such thing as a "true" compass, all are subject to both variation & deviation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson