[MrB]

Your number 3 is where the rub is.

The USSC is a MEMBER of one party of the contract called the Constitution.

They are conflicted and cannot be trusted to render an unbiased “interpretation” of that contract.

[GonzoGOP]

They are conflicted and cannot be trusted to render an unbiased “interpretation” of that contract

Interpretation of the constitution is the only constitutionally sanctioned duty of the supreme court. If they cannot do that, then the institution should be eliminated.

It goes back to my earlier argument of law vs rebellion. If you can no longer trust either the Congress, the Supreme Court or the Executive to uphold the constitution it is time for a rebellion. It may be justified, but it cannot be legal. Since what you are doing is throwing the entire body of law into the dumpster with the intention of writing a new body of laws.