Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: You know, my plan’s a lot like RomneyCare, isn’t it?
Hot Air ^ | March 30, 2010 | AllahPundit

Posted on 03/30/2010 7:33:31 PM PDT by yongin

Alternate headline: “Obama hands devastating new attack ad to Romney opponents on a silver platter.” If you don’t have time to watch this now, no worries: You’ll be seeing the part about Mitt in eight thousand different GOP primary spots starting early next year. So brutal is it — think what kind of beating Charlie Crist is taking over the photo of him hugging Obama, then multiply by a thousand — that I’m tempted to believe The One set out to mention Romney with that idea in mind. If he can take out a potentially dangerous Republican nominee early in the game by talking him up, why not talk him up? Coming soon: Obama praises Romney as the sort of centrist, statist, secretly pro-choice Republican America needs. Game over, man.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: acorn4romney; aig4romney; backstabbers4romney; bigdig4romney; carpetbaggers4romney; dnc4romney; du4romney; mittlovesbho; msm4romney; obama4romney; obamalovesmitt; operationleper; patentinfringer; rinos4romney; romney2decide4u; romney4obama; romneycare; romneycare4u; romneythrewelection; saboteurs4romney; stenchofromney; truthers4romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: tlb

Only if by that you mean for “Heritage Foundation” and “Republican’s idea” to translate as socialist medicine, death panels, and an unconstitutional mandate to purchase a product.

Brilliant strategerizing!!!! not.


21 posted on 03/30/2010 8:31:16 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

GO ROMNEY!


22 posted on 03/30/2010 8:31:46 PM PDT by fallingwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: docbnj
There are many other reasons not to live in Massachusetts: it is not called “Taxachusetts” for nothing. Even property taxes are sky high. The gun laws are ridiculous: almost as bad as CA and NJ.

I guess I have been mistaken for along time. I didn't realize that here in California our gun laws are worse than Massachusetts. Back in 1977 I remember driving into Massachusetts and seeing a sign that said "No Guns Allowed" or some such thing at the state line. I have yet to see one like it here in California. I didn't know that I could have carried a loaded, holstered, revolver on my belt in Massachusetts while out in the boonies like I can here in California.

23 posted on 03/30/2010 8:43:48 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: docbnj

Mitt Romney:”These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense,” “They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.”

Mitt Romney: “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”

“Reagan was adamantly pro choice”

Mitt Romney: “I’m not a partisan politician. My hope is that, after this election, it will be the moderates of both parties who will control the Senate, not the Jesse Helmses.”

Mitt Romney:”One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue” military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share.”


24 posted on 03/30/2010 8:55:39 PM PDT by ansel12 ( If you guys can stop Palin, Romney will not have any real opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: yongin

There is no choice between Romney and Obama; they are cut from the same cloth.


25 posted on 03/30/2010 8:55:57 PM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin
Hell, Allahpundit talks about this like its a BAD thing ....I'll take anything that torpedos Myth .... ROFLMAO

FREEDOM!

26 posted on 03/30/2010 9:07:04 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER (NRA member) III Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I oppose Mitt’s candidacy - again; but it has to be pointed out to Obama that there is a huge constitutional difference between the powers of the federal government and the states.


27 posted on 03/30/2010 9:08:32 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yongin

Does Obama really consider Romney a threat? I mean has he ‘misread’ the tea leaves that badly?


28 posted on 03/30/2010 9:10:10 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: docbnj
Putting aside the multiple examples of confusion exhibited by your post, I'll focus on only one:

Massachusetts also has very restrictive gun laws. Other states don’t have to imitate that, either.

States have a Fourteenth Amendment-imposed constitutional duty to protect the unalienable rights of the people. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a God-given unalienable right. No state has a "right" to infringe on the people's right to defend themselves, their families, their communities, their country, and their Constitution.

29 posted on 03/30/2010 9:23:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yongin

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. ~Napoleon Bonaparte


30 posted on 03/30/2010 10:35:59 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin; fieldmarshaldj; Allegra; ansel12

And Myth is bashing Obamacare. While defending the similar legislation he approved in MA.

Too lame for words. Such rank hypocrisy is best suited for democrats.


31 posted on 03/31/2010 12:45:09 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: docbnj

“this program was instituted in one state, and was therefore allowed by the US Constitution”

Wrong. First, it just means nobody has successfully challenged it on Constitutional grounds. Yet. Second, it might mean states can pass MittCare or ObamaCare, but does not address if the US govt is Constitutionally empowered to do so.

I could go on (and on), but I think that makes the point...


32 posted on 03/31/2010 5:14:16 AM PDT by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson