1 posted on
03/30/2010 4:13:56 PM PDT by
NYer
To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; markomalley; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; ...
Catholic Ping Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
2 posted on
03/30/2010 4:14:28 PM PDT by
NYer
("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
To: NYer
What????
The MSM is LYING to us???
And some folks on FR are swallowing it hook, line, and sinker???
No Way!!!
3 posted on
03/30/2010 4:15:03 PM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: NYer
In reality, the accused priest was still a defendant in a church trial.
In reality, the accused priest should have been a defendant in a criminal trial, but that would have been "icky" for the church's image.
7 posted on
03/30/2010 4:25:04 PM PDT by
TSgt
(When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: NYer
I guess the ‘Old Grey Lady’ didn’t want to be confused by the facts, so the NY Times reporter didn’t even bother trying to contact the person who was ‘quoted’ in the article.
12 posted on
03/31/2010 11:49:43 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: NYer
I agree that the Holy Father is blameless in the Murphy incident, but he does bear some responsibility for returning the pederast back to pastoral dudy in Munich during the 1980's.
Overall his record on the abuse issue is very good, but it is not spotless, which shouldn't be a surprise given that he's human.
What I find very dissapointing is that in the one case where he's not blameless, he refuses to take responsibility. He would be much more effective going forward if he admitted it and moved forward.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson