McCain and Palin: Reunited and Feeling Good ("I support his position on immigration")

Fox News ^ | 2010-03-27

[rabscuttle385]

(snip)

VAN SUSTEREN: Governor Palin, if you were vice president today, what would you be telling a President McCain about what to do about immigration, if anything?

PALIN: I support his position on immigration. It all comes down to securing the border. And he who has actually proposed some solutions, the Obama administration does not want to listen to Senator McCain or any other Republican, and that, of course, leads to a greater problem that we have in Washington, D.C. And it's that lack of the new administration's ability and enthusiasm for listening to those on the other side of the aisle who have some good solutions that they want considered.

(snip)

[dforest]

Then allow the process to happen. If Palin is who you think she is, she won’t need people to flame everyone who hasn’t jumped on the wagon yet. She will gain their vote by campaigning against the others and convincing them she is the one they should vote for.

This process will happen all on its own, unless Obozo passes amnesty. Then it won’t much matter who is running.

[pissant]

How does that compare to the 33,000 Palin posts proclaiming she is to be coronated? The 22,000 Palin posts proclaiming her to be a mix of Ronald Reagan and Daniel Boone? The 15,000 posts slamming anyone who dares point out her flaws? The 75,000 posts of every tweet, facebookie, or utterance she says?

And the 100,000 posts pushing her to president? Should the rest of us who want someone else just pipe down until she declares?

[SoConPubbie]

Then allow the process to happen. If Palin is who you think she is, she won’t need people to flame everyone who hasn’t jumped on the wagon yet. She will gain their vote by campaigning against the others and convincing them she is the one they should vote for.

This process will happen all on its own, unless Obozo passes amnesty. Then it won’t much matter who is running.

Indy,

I'm very selective in whom I am responding to.

Those who have an honest opinion, I have no problem with.

Those who practice false-labeling, hyperbole, negative-association, and flat-out lying about Governor Palin, I will respond to.

Occasionally I do make mistakes, just like everyone else. However, IMHO, I think my track record is at least decent in determining who is exaggerating or lying and who is sincere.

Sorry if I offended you, it was not my intention.

I do take the approach of being blunt and to the point, as being mister nice-guy just does not cut-it for most of these posters.

I do agree with you concerning letting Palin win over voters naturally with her own God-given talents and hopefully correct positions on the issues.

But posters who are not being fair, and have been called on it, deserve no quarter.

[dforest]

Then, those who are posting untruths about her you can go after.

Her record and the things that actually come out of her mouth are what they are.

They are open to debate. This will happen if she runs, so get used to it. Only she knows how she plans to respond to them.

The BS the left throws at her is just that. I stand up for her when that happens.

[SoConPubbie]

And the 100,000 posts pushing her to president? Should the rest of us who want someone else just pipe down until she declares?

Nope, absolutely not.

You'll notice I've said almost nothing negative about Jim Demint or Hunter in all of my posting history.

My only beef is with posters who continually make it a sport to demonize Governor Palin using scant evidence, hyperbolic statements, false-labeling, and unsupported negative comments. Usually, like Rabscuttle385(Ron Paul supporter), they refuse to take the same hard-line with their own candidates.

They should expect nothing but grief when they take part in such behavior.

I have no problem with other conservative candidates or their supporters, only those who engage, in what appears, to be very deceitful, or unfair practices.

I'd do the same and have done the same for both Jim Demint and Duncan Hunter.

[SoConPubbie]

They are open to debate. This will happen if she runs, so get used to it. Only she knows how she plans to respond to them.

The BS the left throws at her is just that. I stand up for her when that happens.

Exactly!

[SoConPubbie]

Sorry Rabs, I should have pinged you.

[onyx]

Hey did you know Paul is a Porker

Yes and he's a hypocrit about it, but that's the least of my concerns about the dangerous kook.

He thinks Iran is not a threat and that 911 was an inside job.

[FreeReign]

Here’s what DeMint said about McCain-Kennedy, you know the bill that Sarah gleefully endorsed:

Palin "gleefully endorsed" the McCain-Kennedy bill?

What are you talking about??

Sarah was asked about the bill and the amnesty as a pathway to citizenship that was in it and she said she was not for it.

[pissant]

Horsecrap

[cva66snipe]

You're comparison is not even close.

Yes it is. Including the growingyoou'll love Palin or else demands. I've been in here much, much, longer than you. I've seen the cycles each election. I saw the Bush supporters take over FR and others who dared question a Bush booted out for doing so. The election for POTUS is 2012. I wish some in here would slow down and give others a chance before then. She may well make a good Conservative a great VP I'll give her that much. But that's all I'll give her at this time.

Sarah, with the exception of this Immigration issue, is a bona-fide conservative, Socially, Fiscally, and Militarily.

The issue is so serious for the future of our nation it is non negotiable. If she doesn't understand it? Well to bad so sad I'll vote for someone else. A man was murdered in cold blood very highy likely by an illegal allien this past weekend while her beloved Johnny B Liberal sat for years on his LIBERAL sitter and helped make stopping Illegal Immigration an impossibility. If she wants illegals? Then move each and every single one too Alaska and see how well she's adored there then.

Three things are a must this election. Dealing harshly with illegals once and for all, stopping Obama care, and putting a halt to Obama's dangerous policies against Israel.

I refuse to support someone who supports and is so devoted to the reelection of Johnny B. Liberal when a better candidate is running. Palin may well ruin any chance of getting McCain out and another Republican in because of her misguided loyalties. We went through 8 years of W doing this very same thing. No Thanks.

[FreeReign]

Here’s what DeMint said about McCain-Kennedy, you know the bill that Sarah gleefully endorsed:

You said that Sarah endorsed McCain-Kennedy.

Now document YOUR horsecrap!!

[pissant]

http://www.univision.com/content/content.jhtml?chid=3&schid=10414&secid=25534&cid=1716304&pagenum=2

http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/dinan/2008/Oct/26/palin-finally-speaks-immigration-supports-path-cit/

[SoConPubbie]

Horsecrap

Pissant/FreeReign,

I would appreciate links if you have them.

[SoConPubbie]

Yes it is. Including the growingyoou'll love Palin or else demands. I've been in here much, much, longer than you. I've seen the cycles each election. I saw the Bush supporters take over FR and others who dared question a Bush booted out for doing so. The election for POTUS is 2012. I wish some in here would slow down and give others a chance before then. She may well make a good Conservative a great VP I'll give her that much. But that's all I'll give her at this time.

Anytime someone falls back on the "I've been here longer than you" all I want to do is spit!

That means squat in any discussion of the issues.

If you are trying to make a logical point, you are going to have to drop the emotional garbage like that.

It is meaningless and does nothing to convince anyone of the correctness of your position.

[FreeReign]

Here’s what DeMint said about McCain-Kennedy, you know the bill that Sarah gleefully endorsed:

Nowhere in your links does she say that she endorses McCain-Kennedy.

Unbelievable that you would post such a claim and that it was sitting on the thread for hours.

[SoConPubbie]

Three things are a must this election. Dealing harshly with illegals once and for all, stopping Obama care, and putting a halt to Obama's dangerous policies against Israel.

So do, pray tell, tell who among the possible candidates will all address three issues?

The only one that I know of is Duncan Hunter, and unless things change dramatically, he is going nowhere in the polls.

It's not that I disagree with you, I just don't see any options out there.

[pissant]

Are you really this dense, or just act that way on the internet?

No, she just said she supports McCain’s position, then went on to articulate that with her answers. McCain’s position was and is AMNESTY, as codified by McCain-Kennedy. Next you are going to tell me that Palin did not know of the ADS THAT MCCAIN/PALIN RAN ON SPANISH RADIO AND TV:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75933

[cva66snipe]

Anytime someone falls back on the "I've been here longer than you" all I want to do is spit! That means squat in any discussion of the issues. If you are trying to make a logical point, you are going to have to drop the emotional garbage like that. It is meaningless and does nothing to convince anyone of the correctness of your position.

LOL Good grief. Everybody knows the PURGE cycles in here every election and the follow the "annointed one" or else policy. I don't have to make that up every long time poster knows it happens. You haven't seen it yet that's all. First look up pre-2000 post in FR. It was a completely different forum. Next look up the ancient history of poster "illbay" and his post on FR. "Illbay" finally burned out LOL.

I said I've been in here longer and I've seen a lot more. I remember it well. Bush said one thing and poster said he said another despite showing them the text saying otherwise.

Good grief I can even give names of former long gone good posters. Their forum sin? Not bowing to Da Bush. I hope this doesn't happen this time with Palin supporters taking over and no honest dissent being allowed. But you watch and we'll see who's right.

[cva66snipe]

It's not that I disagree with you, I just don't see any options out there.

It's only 2010. Let's wait a couple more years before making the pick shall we? That is a long time political wise. Plenty of time for someone to step out. The wiser one may well be sitting back and letting the Palin craze run it's course. Truth is. The shorter you can make your campaign the less liable you are to be damaged. Less time to dig dirt and less time living under glass. Give it another year and see what happens.